Unfortunately for Biden, I think his entire legacy will be defined by his refusal to deal with Trump.
Yup. But I don't feel bad for him about it. Either he's actually a dementia patient, or he is a grown man that made choices with consequences. He chose to be a do-nothing for the greatest threat to American democracy in all of our lifetimes. He -deserves- to be remembered for that and literally nothing else.
he's easily the best president of my lifetime.
No denying, really. I mean, to be fair, that bar is so low that you need a back-hoe to find it. But it's true. And none of it will matter because everything he did has been undone. Because he didn't secure the future. Didn't even make a half-hearted attempt at it. Best president of our time and his presidency was utterly worthless. It's like he painted your new kitchen right before the wrecking ball showed up for the demo. He literally could have been the worst Democrat president in our lifetimes and the actual reality of this moment would be the same.
Like most old Democrats, he's an institutionalist til the very end. Even when the institutions are crumbling around him.
Absolutely. That's still a choice he made that he should be held entirely accountable for.
Knowing the Democrats, Biden would've burned it to the ground, and they would've nominated Kamala in '24, anyway. Left her covered in the inescapable stink of it. I guess that wouldn't have mattered so much if the Republican nominee wasn't Trump or a groyper. (Seriously, if you hate Trump, just wait until you see what type of person the College Republicans have been cooking up for the last 15 years. There are a lot more Marjorie Taylor Greenes and Matt Gaetzs on the way.)
If Biden had done his actual job - it probably wouldn't have mattered who the next nominee was as long as they were reasonably competent, because all of the insurrectionists would be in jail or dead from self-inflicted gunshot wounds. He had 4 entire years to reform the system with the literal, actual, -unilateral consequence-free power- that the Supreme Court claimed presidents have. The second that ruling came down it should have been game over for Republicans. And it wasn't because Biden is a simpering piece of shit greedy coward.
But also, if we peel the onion of when someone should've stood up and stopped what was happening with the Republican party, we'll end up with a stinking empty hand, because that onion goes back 40 years.
Absolutely. But when people use this as a defense for Biden, I get literally sick to my stomach with rage. No other president in our lifetimes presided over a country where the presumptive nominee for president from the other party was a known insurrectionist. We can blame Dems for allowing it to get that far, and we absolutely should. But the extant danger of the Republican party and Donald Trump himself, was NEVER clearer than during Biden's presidency. Nor was it ever -easier- to deal with, given their actual constant public crimes. Biden failed in a deeper, more obvious, and more awful way than any president before him. It's not fair to let him defray an ounce of that weight onto previous administrations.
But I went to bed every night while he was in office sure we weren't going to drive the country into a Depression or have high school students kidnapped by government contractors in tacti-cool cosplay.
I'm not Cassandra over here. But I went to bed every night fully aware that Biden was doing nothing to stop those things from happening in a couple of years' time. I was not comforted by Biden's presidency on any day, for any moment. Because he was clearly, visibly, doing nothing over the entire 4 years about the looming authoritarian danger we ALL saw coming. Every morning I woke up to a new commitment by Biden to make sure Donald Trump gets to play King. We all saw the misery and abject suffering that was right over the horizon. I don't know how anyone slept well with Biden in office, watching him do nothing to prevent any of it.
and I hate that I truly believe that a chunk of swing voters won't vote for someone brown or female in our lifetimes and we have to take that into consideration in every election.
Yeah, I agree. I think the fact that we couldn't elect a white woman with a beloved (mostly) former president husband that oversaw the greatest economy in many of our lifetimes should have probably told us we weren't ready for a female president at all (let alone a non-white one) and running a female candidate right now - specifically one that doesn't already have massive support - is virtue-signalling political suicide.
Is it WRONG that it's like this? Absolutely. But we can't slam our heads against a wall and insist we're just going to do it anyway just to prove we're not sexist like 'them.' Especially when we don't even have a non-white/female candidate we can run that anyone gives a flying fuck about. If it were fucking Beyonce? Sure - run her. She'd probably win because America is a cesspit of fucking idiots. I honestly can't think of a single woman in politics beyond AOC that would even have a chance at winning a presidential election. And even AOC is a bit of a long shot.