Also, I’m sticking with my pet theory that Absolute figures will serve as the debut of Mattel. Don’t get me wrong, have zero inside info here, but just makes so much sense.
I don’t have any idea what Mattel will do either. Not really. But my sense of it is that no matter what engineering and technical improvements they make to the figures, this will be a low risk endeavor for Mattel. At least in terms of character selection and the overall style of the line. In particular, where the things we’d be interested in as adult collectors are concerned.
Batman
Superman
Wonder Woman
Green Lantern
Flash
Green Arrow
Aquaman
Hawkman (maybe)
And the characters (family, villains) in their orbits.
JLA
JSA
Titans
Omnibus membership and villains. This is what I believe will be the outer limits of character selection.
In terms of costumes and uniforms, I believe it will skew modern/iconic with classic/traditional mixed in. In terms of sculpts, I foresee a very homogeneous, generic style. Almost bland in some respects to maintain a cohesion among these characters. Cookie cutter is a term that been thrown around. Think Jose Luis Garcia Lopez 1982 style guides updated to 2026. Some people see that as appealing. I’m not among them.
DC is a tapestry woven over decades by thousands of people. Jack Kirby stands next to Alex Ross at the loom. Neal Adams, George Perez, and Greg Capullo have all stood there at one time or another. Simon Bisley and Bill Sienkiewicz too and so many more. So why do action figures all have to look the same?
I do not want just legacy and heritage characters. I do not want a homogenized generic looking lineup. And I mostly don’t want a DC Legends line, which is where I think this is headed. A Marvel Legends analog. Many will cheer. But not me.