Legit never seen someone prefer Mojo and Arcade to Sinister and Apocalypse. Let your freak flag fly. I dig all four of them for different reasons.
See, this I think is an issue with the medium. There's hardly a comic villain around with more than 10 years of backstory that I don't think has been either completely defanged by overuse (and often being reformed), or marginalized to the point of absurdity. But that's a function of the monthly perpetual release schedule. I kind of take all comic villains as how I feel about them conceptually and in context of their best bits, rather than taking every story of theirs in continuity because, well, they basically all get watered down by their worst depictions if we take it all in.
It's the thing I mentioned either here or another thread when comparing Nimrod to the Borg. The Borg, first two, even three times out the gate with the TNG crew, fantastic baddies. Once they become recurring on Voyager they lose any semblance of threat. And it's just how they're treated. You could make the Borg cool again today, but you can't treat them like a villain of the week. You gotta be disciplined enough to use them sparingly and to give them big shit to do.
I think the same is true of sentinels. One thing that drew me into the Powers of/House of books was the Sentinels felt threatening immediately. Hickman sets up this ticking clock of how much time before someone creates a Nimrod, and how once that happens it's all over. Then he sets up bigger stakes about the deep time and AI vs organic life. And even without Nimrod, that first mission to the Mother Mold kills the entire team. That's pretty good. Feels very Days of Future Past.