Ru1977
The Irishman
It definitely has a lot of fun...
Oh, so they're really just trying to bury this one. Get it out and get it gone. Noted. I'm still gonna give it a chance though.
Apologies in advance for slightly derailing things and taking the topic way too seriously- I'm in a bit of a mood today.
But to further your point, part of me admittedly does hate this age of armchair experts, where anyone and everyone is instantly a professional movie critic. Obviously everyone is allowed their own opinion, but we pay way too much attention to the snobs who think they know what a movie is or ought to be just because they watched a lot of them and have a degree or semi-successful YouTube channel. Not every movie needs to be an Oscar-worthy gourmet meal. Sometimes your body wants- and needs- those little unhealthy fats too. I don't know why this turned into a food metaphor all of a sudden, but you know what I mean. I've seen some of the most highly regarded movies that have swept awards, and was bored out of my mind by them. Taste is subjective, and the notion that people aren't allowed to have guilty pleasures (which is another term I don't really care for- why should I feel guilty for liking something?), is just plain silly. I never begrudge anyone their opinion, so long as it is their opinion, and they're not just echoing some nobody critic they like who convinced them before they even saw it that it was gonna suck.
And I say all that knowing I'm every bit as guilty as anyone else of saying what's good and what isn't, but it's different because my opinion is the best and everyone who doesn't agree with it is just wrong.![]()
Right. It's a bit much. Just enjoy what you enjoy. And really, I'd rather focus more on things I do enjoy than the things I don't. Except apparently star wars, I can bitch about some star wars.anyone and everyone is instantly a professional movie critic
I actually fell completely off YouTube. Even new rockstars, who leans toward very positive, I don't tune into anymore.YouTube
I'm the same way. I like what I like and will watch it without guilt anytime. The least Catholic thing about me is my movie tastes heh.guilty pleasures (which is another term I don't really care for- why should I feel guilty for liking something?),
I'm sure I am too. I can't think of instances but I'm sure.I'm every bit as guilty as anyone else of saying what's good and what isn't
part of me admittedly does hate this age of armchair experts, where anyone and everyone is instantly a professional movie critic.
I agree. But I think the problem is that in this day and age of 'engagement as currency' - professional movie critics, in theory, are the most likely to be actually just reviewing a movie. The self-appointed critics are just there for clicks, no matter what they have to say to get them, and therefore the 'reviews' are usually worthless drama-bait. Either the movie with the black female lead is the best movie fucking EVER because you're on the Left and/or need to virtue signal, or the black female lead movie is the fucking WORST movie ever because you're on the Right and/or need to dog whistle.The only thing I find wrong about this is that there are professional movie critics.
I think *everybody* should be a critic. You see a movie or read a book you like or don't like? Talk about it. If you're able to articulate why, even better.
Yup. This is totally accurate. I think (professional) criticism will tend toward the negative for that very reason; you're more likely to be negative toward something you didn't really even want to have an opinion on but it's your job so here we go...That's a huge problem for anything where your opinion becomes your job. I can now no longer trust you to be impartial. You *have* to say something instead of *wanting* to say something. That's why professional critics are such a weird thing to me.
The worst part is that in our modern world there kind of actually IS 24 hours worth of news every day, but the 24 hour news channels refuse to cover any of it for fear of upsetting our oligarch overlords.It's like when CNN started the 24-hour news cycle, and suddenly had to find news to fill the time rather than just reporting on news that happened (if anybody remembers the Before Times).
I prefer reviews mostly that aren't reviews. Good examples are Dominic Noble; who evaluates adaptations (comparing what they do well, what they do poorly, what they changed or kept the same, etc) and Red/Blue of Overly Sarcastic Productions, who do a lot of deep dives on tropes and stuff like that, which often plays at the edges of reviewing content at times. But in both cases, these aren't -reviews-. They're -discussions of the material-, and I find that just way more interesting.I do allow a little wiggle room for review-as-performance, though. There are some reviewers who are just entertaining to watch as performers, and if they have to exaggerate an opinion to get a laugh out of me, at least I get to laugh.
I think that's cos we all think of each other here as human beings and are like "let me not piss off these people I enjoy gabbing with" while people on various social media platforms often don't think of anyone else as a human being.@docsilence and that's funny about people liking the movie then spoiling it right away, since here this of us who loved Thunderbolts were spoiler tagging for like two weeks! We really wanted those who hadn't seen it yet to see it fresh.