Atomic Knight
Studious
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2025
- Messages
- 540
Toy Fair is Feb 14-17th. Guessing for more there.
The likeness (at least for Evil Lyn) looks terrible, but I'm encouraged somewhat by the articulation. Looks like a ball-jointed waist on Man-At-Arms and the paint seems substantial enough.They've shown off a couple of the figures from the new He-Man movie. Is this an adult collector line? I'm not well-versed in the various MOTU offerings. If this is adult collector, then I'm not feeling particularly excited about the future of DC movie figures, but I suppose in fairness these aren't the best pics. Toynewsi has more photos https://toynewsi.com/241-61550
![]()
![]()
The faces don't look very good here, and Evil Lyn has that same crappy material they've been using for capes going back to (at the very least) that awful Dick Grayson Batman from their old Multiverse line.
There's like zero chance those are 5.5". Those look to be your standard Masterverse figures, with maybe some updates to the articulation model they've been using.Those MOTU movie figures are also a smaller scale (5.5") but supposedly have 30 points of articulation.
For sure. And that's fair. I'm not sure how much any company, at this point, can expect people to keep re-starting collections. That being said, collectors also need to manage their own expectations for what a company like Mattel is going to bring to the table with something like DC.the point I’m trying to make is that just because this will be a new line doesn’t mean I’m interested in buying “good enough” figures of the same characters in the same looks for the third, fourth, or fifth and up time in the last 25 years…and that’s pretty much what I’m expecting from Mattel.
In the '90s, my only exposure to Batman was Batman: The Animated Series. I still forced my parents to get me Scuba Batman or whatever other ridiculous variant was on shelves.How does Mattel intend to make the argument to kids that these figures are the exact designs you remember from the comics when A) There’s the chance that this is no longer the case and B) most surveys regarding demographics who lean towards pop culture and those that don’t have proven time and time again that younger Gen Z and Gen Alpha kids are not as concerned with reading the comics or even are concerned with comic book movies, collectibles, video games and other forms of entertainment in general compared to the generations prior.
I’m worried that by locking these mainline figures into a contemporary design might alienate their audiences. Especially since DC is so whimsical that they’ll change a character’s appearance 5-6 times in the span of a year. They’ve already done that with Batman. In the past six months Batman has worn his Dan Mora designed suit with the piping, he went back to his old Hush era/ Year One costume, then he wore a black and grey variant of his 90’s suit, he’s now in the redesigned Batsuit with the blue emblem and I recently saw a solicit for a comic coming out later this year where Batman is in his old Rebirth costume.
How does Mattel intend to make the argument to kids that these figures are the exact designs you remember from the comics when A) There’s the chance that this is no longer the case and B) most surveys regarding demographics who lean towards pop culture and those that don’t have proven time and time again that younger Gen Z and Gen Alpha kids are not as concerned with reading the comics or even are concerned with comic book movies, collectibles, video games and other forms of entertainment in general compared to the generations prior. I think Mattel is making a grave miscalculation on this kids toy line because I think they’re relying to much on the old model of how they sold their figures. But their 7 year absence can make a world of difference in terms of reaching their target audience, if it’s even there at all anymore
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm with you. After collecting DC figures for 25ish years from DC Direct / DC Collectibles, Mattel and McFarlane my biggest wants are mostly civilian characters or secondary/tertiary Legion of Super Heroes characters that never got made by Mattel in the 12-pack or by DCD/DCC (Ferro Lad, Invisible Kid, etc).All I need to see is a female Legionaire (other than Saturn Girl) form the Levitz/Giffen era that rivals any other 6” to 7” figure in the domestic market in terms of both overall quality and value, and I’m in.
Absolutely. It’s more of an indictment of where I’m at as a collector than it is of Mattel. I mean, it’s going to be a mass market DC line. They’re going to play the hits, and the quality will likely be the similar to Hasbro’s or McFarlane’s.If collectors are expecting Mattel to suddenly be cranking out Mafex-style figures and have the entire first six waves be deep cut characters never made by any modern DC line before.... well, they're fucking cracked in the head and need to, as the kids say, go touch grass.
I think a lot of us are there. If Hasbro lost Marvel, am I ever going to go in on another line of Marvel figures? Probably not. I might grab a Wolverine or something, but that's about it. I'm old enough to be hitting this point where I feel like re-starting collections can't be this perpetual thing. Especially when the new one doesn't really offer anything the old one didn't besides being a bit more modern.Absolutely. It’s more of an indictment of where I’m at as a collector than it is of Mattel. I mean, it’s going to be a mass market DC line. They’re going to play the hits, and the quality will likely be the similar to Hasbro’s or McFarlane’s.
Those MOTU movie figures are also a smaller scale (5.5")