Are we sure it isn't as simple as Book of Boba Fett was a Bad Show and Andor was a Good Show?Totally. It really just comes down to the material. Book of Boba Fett, for instance. Boba worked because the mystery was part of his character. The more we knew, the less interesting he became. Whereas one of the reasons why I loved Andor was that we got to know about Cassian more. He was a blank slate just like Boba, but the filling in of the gaps actually helped me appreciate him more, and they still managed to explain who he is and where he came from without taking away the nuance and gray area.
The same goes for fleshing out Darth/Anakin through the prequels. Fleshing him out wasn't the issue; it's that the story was bad. While I'm an ROTS defender, I hate Eps I and II.
My new mantra with franchise IP is "why does this exist?" Does it exist to sell another ticket, or for an actual storytelling reason? I didn't like Thunderbolts, but you can clearly point to the reason it existed (telling a superhero story about mental health).
Unfortunately, I think the MCU is so down and out that they need to answer two questions:
1) why does it exist?
2) is this good?
For me, Thunderbolts checked the first box but not the second. I think Star Wars needs to start asking itself the same questions.
Amen. Imagine how brave it would've been for Disney to end the MCU with Endgame.As much as I love Star Wars, Marvel, etc etc etc, in my heart I wish we had more room in our consumer/creative society for stories THAT FUCKING END. It's okay to tell a whole story!
I'm not so foolish to think that they'd stop the money train there. They could've started the MCU 2.0 with the X-Men (or Shang-Chi and the current crop). It would've been a lot better than shoehorning Ant-Man, Sam Cap, and other legacy characters into bad in-between stories.