Star Wars Movie and Streaming Series Discussion

Regardless of how many Jedi survive aside from Ben and Yoda the story doesn't hold up. Yoda almost took out Palpy alone and Ben took down Anakin at his peak. Together they could have taken out each individually. The PT and OT don't square with each other.
 
As far as being able to enjoy a story even though it follows a story I've deleted from head canon, I'm definitely ready for that. If nothing else, I'm eager for more Boba Fett, even if it continues his adventures on tatooine. In fact, they made it real easy to ignore that show since he and Fennec are left in the exact same position as the very end of Mandalorian Season 2: in control of the planet via the crime organization. I don't need to consider how he got his own wookiee comrade and all that.
 
True, and the Breha idea is really interesting. That could absolutely work. BUT... you'd lose a lot of my favorite bits of the show, like her asking Obi-Wan about her parents. I get it doesn't jibe, totally get why that's any issue. But I loved those moments too much.
Oh yeah. I try to look at it with two different lenses at once: the stuff I like and the stuff that would have made a better story. Just because I liked watching something doesn't mean it served the narrative. You can have a very cool moment or a very sweet moment that also breaks the entire story. In which case, I don't think those moments are worth preserving (if you had a magic time machine or something, obviously).

Just for instance, imagine if it's the hidden child of a Jedi Anakin killed, and Ben has to explain to the child what happened to his father. That could be an interesting conversation as Ben says very little, but we can see writ on his face that it's all his fault. He didn't kill Anakin when he had the chance and Darth Vader caused untold suffering afterward. His failure to act essentially being thrown in his face.

Bring on Kiera Knightley and have Ben explain to her how he failed Padme. Lots of potentially great, powerful moments were lost so we could have 'sassy kid-Leia.' Although I, too, loved those moments that we got. It's only kind of in retrospect that I can look back and say 'I really enjoyed that, but it also doesn't make any sense that any of this happened.'


tumblr_oiasuaubpn1ue779no2_400.gif
It IS cool. I actually liked Solo a lot better on rewatch than initial viewing. Of course, there's a lot of things I'd change, but maybe not as much as other people. A big one is to just stop trying to fucking explain every goddamn trinket the guy owns as some important thing from his past. Can't he just have a blaster? Does it have to be a special blaster he got from some other dude....? Like.. ick.


That's fair - I liked we saw some of Leia and how she would have become the radicalized Princess of the films.
Oh definitely. I actually think young Leia could be a really interesting show on its own. I just don't think it needs to be conflated with a show about Ben and Vader. Something more like Andor would serve Leia really well, I think.

I admit, I was one who really liked the Obi-Wan show because it gave me just enough of a glimpse to not have Obi-Wan being a hermit for 20 years and Alderaan just being a plot point and Leia somehow being a leader of the Rebellion. So any inconsistencies are less important to me because I think it makes the story told in ANH better, the same way Andor does. So as is often the case, we all are more likely to defend what we like.
I actually like Kenobi's show as well, actually. Just to be clear - I like most of Star Wars to some extent or another. I think the only piece of Star Wars media I outright despise and refuse to accept is Rise of Skywalker, and even then I probably could have accepted it with some relatively small changes.
When I sit and draft up these big theses about how it could have been, it's just a thought experiment on what I think did the story no justice or could have been done better - not me saying the movies and shows are all bad and ruin everything, or anything like that.

From that perspective - I like Obi-Wan, but I also think the things it accomplished could have been accomplished without the things it did badly or shouldn't have done. And, of course, that's all from my own perspective and to my own personal tastes.
Kind of how I can pinpoint the moment I lost confidence in the ST was when in the aftermath of Han's death you have Leia hug Rey as Chewie saunters by in the background.
My god. I was furious.


I'll watch it and see. I have no animosity to Rey or the characters they introduced, and I'd kind of be happy to see Rey in a story that isn't undercutting the OT and a story based around rebuilding the Jedi Order could be interesting
I'd phrase it this way - the fact I think they messed up with the ST doesn't change that I like the OT


But I think my question would be (and maybe right now there is no answer or you don't care to give it or think about it or whatever) - if this new thing you're 'watching and seeing' is good, but also references a lot of events in the ST - making things you didn't like essential to the new thing you do like. Do you retroactively say 'okay fine' and accept the ST as canon? Like.. how do you deal with liking a thing that relies on a thing you don't like? Maybe that's a question that can't really be answered until/unless it happens.
The ST can't ruin the OT because you can ignore it. But can the ST ruin what comes -next-, even if it's good, because that next thing relies on the ST to exist and references its events and relies on it as canon?


Regardless of how many Jedi survive aside from Ben and Yoda the story doesn't hold up. Yoda almost took out Palpy alone and Ben took down Anakin at his peak. Together they could have taken out each individually. The PT and OT don't square with each other.

This is correct. The only way it works is (as they should have done) to end the Yoda/Palpy fight with Yoda diminished immediately - unable to reach prior levels of power or functionality so that the idea of actually fighting any Sith becomes a non-option, as well as to really press on the idea that Vader is more powerful than Anakin, not less powerful. Then you can explain Ben/Yoda not immediately teaming up. But even then, that relies on there being almost no Jedi left.
There's a lot of ways to write it that it could make sense - they just didn't choose any of them.

And, of course, 'Jedi are cool' and Star Wars, as we discussed earlier in this thread, decided at some point to become way more Jedi-centric. Which invariably meant constantly introducing new 'oh yeah, this guy survived too' Jedi to the story and fucking the narrative all up. It's such a weird decision, too, because there's like a thousand year period where you could write stories about all the Jedi you want. But everyone wants to do it like right in the middle of the OT or whatever.

As far as being able to enjoy a story even though it follows a story I've deleted from head canon, I'm definitely ready for that. If nothing else, I'm eager for more Boba Fett, even if it continues his adventures on tatooine. In fact, they made it real easy to ignore that show since he and Fennec are left in the exact same position as the very end of Mandalorian Season 2: in control of the planet via the crime organization. I don't need to consider how he got his own wookiee comrade and all that.
You don't need to consider it. But how enjoyable is that show going to be if it's constantly referencing events from Book of Boba. At what point do you check out and say 'they keep mentioning the exact things I hated' even if it's mostly a good show on its own merits? That's where the spinning, twisting head-canon comes into existence, and you have to start picking and choosing which movies and shows 'exist' for you, but which pieces of them exist, which lines of dialogue you have to pretend they didn't say, etc.

Again, not saying it can't be done. Just saying it sucks and makes having your own head canon way harder.
 
Bring on Kiera Knightley
Oooooo, and she needs to be a character in the Star Wars: Empire show I keep pitching in this thread!
Lots of potentially great, powerful moments were lost so we could have 'sassy kid-Leia.'
Well, for that show, sure, but you can still have those moments. if they did a second Obi-Wan show, stuff like that could be worked in. I know some really have Skywalker fatigue, but none of the alternatives to Obi-Wan discussing Leia's real parents with her is nearly as impactful for me, personally.

I was fine with sassy kid Leia though. What I wish they'd edited out was fumbling kidnapper Flea. How the hell did that nonsense make it out of the editing room in that state?! Show them finding her in the woods.... and cut. Even dumb audiences can figure out what's happening, especially when next we see her is on their ship and they're dickish to her.
A big one is to just stop trying to fucking explain every goddamn trinket the guy owns as some important thing from his past.
Agreed, but my smile during that movie overshadowed my eyerolling.
Something more like Andor would serve Leia really well, I think.
Oh, yes please.
But I think my question would be (and maybe right now there is no answer or you don't care to give it or think about it or whatever) - if this new thing you're 'watching and seeing' is good, but also references a lot of events in the ST - making things you didn't like essential to the new thing you do like. Do you retroactively say 'okay fine' and accept the ST as canon?
For me, sorta to an extent. Probably won't get me to rewatch the thing I don't like, but I'd love if the new things kinda colors over my memory of the older one. If the new Rey movie(s) is/are great, then I'll be really happy, but barring literal flashbacks using footage from the ST movies, I can kinda fudge over it in my mind. Rey movies Rey can be something of a separate entity from ST Rey.
But how enjoyable is that show going to be if it's constantly referencing events from Book of Boba. At what point do you check out and say 'they keep mentioning the exact things I hated' even if it's mostly a good show on its own merits?
Honestly... assuming the show is good or even great, I can deal with them referencing things I didn't like. If they sit down on a overturned power droid and spend fifteen minutes of screentime playing "remember that time", then yeah... that's not good for anyone. But honestly, I'm READY for a great Boba Fett show to come along and be at least a few of the things I want for the character. And if it builds off a show I disliked, then I'm ready for them to elevate those events in my head. Absolutely. That's what I was hoping for Rise of Skywalker to do with the ST. One more, let's bring it all together and really stick the landing. Or not.

What is unfortunately more likely is I won't like the next Boba Fett show. And that may very well be due to my own preconceived notions or all the "oh, this would be cool" ideas always floating around in my head they should be doing with him. Or, it'll just suck all on its own despite what I want or feel, elevate not a damn thing, and now I have two shows to make me wonder if I'm even really a fan of this guy anymore.

And as far as "watching this thing changes how you feel about the other thing", is Empire Strikes Back ruined by Leia being his sister? I mean, come on, two serious liplocks in that movie. AND, on top of that, when doing interviews for (I think it was) Attack of the Clones, he was talking about how, in Star Wars anyway, kissing is as serious as sleeping together. So that's why Anakin and Padme.... but wait, George, seriously? Have you watched Empire lately? Big goddamned yikes. (I have googled for twenty minutes to find it but cannot. One of these days damnit, but I read it over 20 years ago so maybe my memory has even embellished.)
 
I'd forgotten about the free-the-droids subplot in SOLO. What a missed opportunity. Because truly, you can have lovable characters with personalities, free will, and the ability to feel emotions and if you own them, that's slavery... or you can have toasters. The droids are DEFINITELY not toasters. But also I reckon you have a franchise for half a century, SOME of it is going to age really poorly, and droids calling people "master" is one of them. (I mean, what are the clones if not a conveyor belt of slaves, right?)

Apropos of nothing, my hill I'll die on regarding SOLO: it makes Han's journey better. It completes the arc to make him a tragic hero. It shows us that from birth to death, almost everyone he's ever loved has either betrayed him, cast him aside, sent him away, or abandoned him except Chewie, and he has always, always done the heroic thing in the end. He's not a scoundrel. He's not ethically gray. Han's that rarest of creatures, a good man, and it costs him everything, at every step of his life.
 
what point do you check out and say 'they keep mentioning the exact things I hated' even if it's mostly a good show on its own merits?
This is my conundrum with the Clone Wars cartoon and anything else that relies on or references the prequels. It can be incredibly difficult to love Star Wars and simply be unable to do anything but utterly despise the prequels. I keep trying to rewatch them but they just get worse every time, and every time a prequel-centered thing is mentioned in other SW media I cringe like at least a little bit, and sometimes a LOT, even when the prequel things being referenced are not individually things I hate. Like I was just sitting there ANGRY the whole time Peli Moto was refurbishing that Naboo fighter for Din. That poor starfighter didn’t do anything wrong, but damn it just gave me flashbacks of “now THIS is PODRACING” and back comes the rage at how they massacred the backstory of my boy Darth Vader in those movies and THEN I’m five again, standing on my chair in the movie theatre and screaming when Darth Vader died at the end of Return of the Jedi.

It’s primal, man.

And yet I keep coming back.
 
But I think my question would be (and maybe right now there is no answer or you don't care to give it or think about it or whatever) - if this new thing you're 'watching and seeing' is good, but also references a lot of events in the ST - making things you didn't like essential to the new thing you do like. Do you retroactively say 'okay fine' and accept the ST as canon? Like.. how do you deal with liking a thing that relies on a thing you don't like? Maybe that's a question that can't really be answered until/unless it happens.
I think that's the answer - I don't know yet. If the new Rey film ends up being "Saving Private Ryan" meets "Lawrence of Arabia" meets "2001" meets "Mad Max Fury Road" meets "Blue Velvet" and is the greatest achievement in human cinema, I probably will enjoy it. :cool:

Maybe my point would be clearer if instead of "personal canon" its more "related IP I care about vs the related IP I don't care if I see again" - if I planned a live action Star Wars rewatch, I would definitely include the Lucas films (PT and OT), I would probably include those that tie most directly into that time period and characters (Obi-Wan, Solo, Andor, Rogue One and Mandalorian S1 and S2), I would be on the fence about storylines that are heading farther afield (Ahsoka, Book of Boba Fett and Mandalorian S3), and I would skip the stuff that I felt undermined or was mostly unrelated to the above (ST, The Acolyte, etc.).
 
Right, that's a better way to put it.

Like I'm aware of stuff that happened in books and comics but it's foggy and that's fine. I can treat the related IP I don't care if I see again the same way. I'm aware of it, but don't need to delve into the details of it.
 
Regarding the droids slavery thing- it's a tricky line. Because you have some folks that clearly use droids as slaves (and other living beings as slaves) like Jabba, but then you have people like Luke or Ezra or Cal who treat droids well (and then there's Lando, who, from the sound of things, treats droids very well). It's tricky, because most droids are made and programmed with the distinct ability to work- not necessarily to serve, per se, but it comes down to treatment, I think. They do the jobs that others can't or won't- be it the simpler tasks like teaching, cleaning, serving food, etc. all the way to lava mining. Which is why it's easy for them to fall by the wayside or become abused- when there's no one to advocate for them, they can either just be hastily destroyed, or taken as spoils of war and reprogrammed to do whatever. It's definitely an interesting argument, and a story I'd love to see more of in something; you'd risk disturbing the anti-woke Star Wars fanboys, but then again, what doesn't these days? I really liked L3 in Solo, and would love to see someone or some droid pick up where she left off.

As for acknowledging events in movies I don't care for, I suppose it could happen, but it hasn't bothered me yet. If anything, giving more context to a thing, even retroactively, usually helps me appreciate it more. The only one I can think of that I'm really mixed on is the whole Palpatine clone thing. Because they didn't lay the ground work, they have to spend all this time explaining it after the fact in things like Mando. Luckily, there's enough else going on in the Mandoverse that it's interesting despite that, but I do wish it had more freedom to be its own thing at the end of the day. Does it make me appreciate the Palpy clone a bit more? I guess- it's nice to have any backstory on it at all, even if I still don't care for the thing itself. It really does become more about the "how" than the "what" or "why" for me- it's not what they say, it's how they say it, if that makes sense. The journey is often more fun than the destination anyway. Putting more thought into something is never a bad thing, and often I'll appreciate the effort if nothing else.
 
I wonder if Lucas was going more for a Frodo/Sam thing with Luke and 3PO, since (in the books) Sam does call him master, but isn't a slave. It was more of a British officer kinda thing.

But I dunno, then Lucas put in the "we don't serve their kind here" bit.
 
But I dunno, then Lucas put in the "we don't serve their kind here" bit.
I always assumed that Wuher was just a droidphobe racist.
Honestly even as a little kid I just assumed that the SW universe was super racist. Like obviously the Empire is human supremacist, Leia calling Chewie a “walking carpet”, all kinds of micro- and macroaggressive stuff between races (like yikes yikes yikes how they talk about the Tuskens and the Ewoks and and and) . . . my child-brain assumed the best and thought that Lucas was acknowledging both that SW is derived from American Westerns and also that American Westerns are hella racist in general.
I may have been giving Lucas waaaaaaaay too much credit, though, especially given how he doubled and tripled down on ethic stereotypes for aliens in TPM. The Nemoidians? Oof. Watto? Yikes on bikes.

That’s one of the biggest reasons I love Book of Boba Fett: it deconstructs the hell out of racist assumptions regarding the Tusken culture.
 
I always assumed that Wuher was just a droidphobe racist
Ohhh definitely, but I assume most of the patrons feel the same. That's why they drink there, none of those... You know.
all kinds of micro- and macroaggressive stuff between races
Very true.
especially given how he doubled and tripled down on ethic stereotypes for aliens in TPM.
Ugh... No kidding, but I wonder if Lucas had an innocent "we did British already, let's get more diverse!" plan.
 
Was it an episode of the Mandalorian that actually had the droid bar? I feel like every few years a writer will poke at the whole "are... droids SLAVES?" theme tentatively and almost give us a interesting story with it.

I always figured the galaxy was pretty bigoted, and we got to see the benefits of when you're not a goddamned bigot with things like the Jedi council (look at this group of magnificently diverse weirdos sitting around being ineffective but respectful together) or the rebel alliance (Lando never once demands Nien Nunb speak galactic basic or go home, they just talk like buddies).

I want to give George the "naive old man" / lawful stupid excuse for the alien accents in the prequels. Like, absolutely cringe AF to the point of offensiveness, but I think, looking back, he was just doing the whole "dwarves are Scottish, Elves are British, Hobbits are Irish, Neimoidians are ... East Asian?" and just stepped full-boot into a racist stereotype instead of actually being intentionally racist about it.

That being said, Elves are French, Dwarves are Texan, Hobbits are from Wisconsin, and Neimoidians should have been subtitled instead of given an accent. Watto should've sounded like one of the guys from Pawn Stars.
 
Back
Top