ManOfTheLamb
Pensive
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2025
- Messages
- 458
Ooh. Now I want this to be real, and I want it soon.I bet Savage Crucible will.
Ooh. Now I want this to be real, and I want it soon.I bet Savage Crucible will.
I bet Savage Crucible will.
I'm legitimately overjoyed with the few figures I have. I'm SO excited about the dwarf figure, whenever that finally comes out. And they've already shown off some kind of goblin-y thing at one of the shows that looked really good.I haven't picked up any of their stuff yet, but been meaning to.
Probably worth moving it over to the other thread dedicated to it, but I've only ever seen one Savage Crucible figure for sale anywhere since I heard of them. I'm certainly enough of a fantasy nut to try a second line.I'm legitimately overjoyed with the few figures I have. I'm SO excited about the dwarf figure, whenever that finally comes out. And they've already shown off some kind of goblin-y thing at one of the shows that looked really good.
In terms of aesthetics and functionality/articulation, I really think Savage blows Mythic out of the water, and not just because I have strong opinions about the Four Horsemen. Just as toys, I think Savage makes better, more fun toys. Once they get around to releasing that goblin they showed off, and start getting into more goblin and fantasy creatures, I can't see there being an argument for ML being a better fantasy line.
![]()
I can't speak to Animal Warriors, and probably never will because fuck those guys, but I get what you're saying about ML. That was kind of always my feeling about Four Horsemen's in-house figures. I go way back to the Fwoosh Exclusive Red Elephant, Scarabus, and the Birds Kickstarter. All of those figures were absolutely beautiful, and NONE of them felt like toys that I could actually play with and enjoy.I have big problems with Mythic Legions in terms of QC, durability, etc., but they're fun for what they are. I think my biggest complaint about them is that I'm just afraid to damage them. I know you don't like Spero much either, but I find myself comparing them a lot because Mythic Legions are delicate art and that makes me anxious, but Warriors of the Animal Kingdom figures are kinda basic and very much TOYS instead of collectibles, but I feel like I can kinda bang them around a bit in poses and setups and not freak out about paint scratches and such. Always looking for that sweet spot in the middle, toys that are magnificent to look at but still can be treated like, well, toys.
I honestly was hoping Hasbro would knock it out of the park with their D&D line - a fantasy series as durable and toyetic as Star Wars Black Series, Marvel Legends, or heavens to betsy, Classified? I'd never need a Mythic Legions figures again. But their D&D figures were hot garbage, every single one of them. So for now, they're scratching that itch best. And they have gotten better - the most recent knights are infinitely better than the first generation knights. But I still find QC problems more often than I'd like.I can't speak to Animal Warriors, and probably never will because fuck those guys, but I get what you're saying about ML. That was kind of always my feeling about Four Horsemen's in-house figures. I go way back to the Fwoosh Exclusive Red Elephant, Scarabus, and the Birds Kickstarter. All of those figures were absolutely beautiful, and NONE of them felt like toys that I could actually play with and enjoy.
In fact, The Fwooshephant deteriorated and fell apart all on its own, Scarabus kept falling over even if I pegged him into a stand that I had to buy on my own because 4H doesn't include stands even for a guy with limited leg articulation and hooves for feet, and ditto for the Birds who also kept fucking falling over (and couldn't be pegged onto stands). The Elephant got tossed in the garbage, I think, and I sold everything else.
Then I got the original ML knights because... knights. And the joints fucking sucked. I'd watch them slowly spread-eagle themselves on the shelf and then fall over, or watch them tip forward or backward from their ankles giving out. And they couldn't pose very well, either. They were the quintessence of action figures that were dated in their design choices before they were even released, and then not even made with decent enough quality control to make it excusable.
I want toys that feel like toys. The only exception I make to that is Mezco Conan figures because I'm a Conan fiend AND Mezco figures are BEAUTIFUL - far nicer to look at on the shelf than anything the 4H do. And I say that as someone with a storied history of bitching about Mezco and vowing not to buy from them anymore, so there you go.
The 4H don't really make good toys, is what I'm getting at. And if confronted with a toy company making GOOD TOYS, that articulate better, look just as nice or nicer, have similar price points, and can crank out similar fantasy archetypes? I can't see Four Horsemen's ML line maintaining its place as the most popular line of fantasy action figures. And it shouldn't. It holds that place literally by virtue of being the only one.
Sell me on one or two to try out.I'm legitimately overjoyed with the few figures I have. I'm SO excited about the dwarf figure, whenever that finally comes out. And they've already shown off some kind of goblin-y thing at one of the shows that looked really good.
In terms of aesthetics and functionality/articulation, I really think Savage blows Mythic out of the water, and not just because I have strong opinions about the Four Horsemen. Just as toys, I think Savage makes better, more fun toys. Once they get around to releasing that goblin they showed off, and start getting into more goblin and fantasy creatures, I can't see there being an argument for ML being a better fantasy line.
![]()
Wait, why?I can't speak to Animal Warriors, and probably never will because fuck those guys, but
I LOVED Hasbro's first Drizzt figure (except for his super weird skin tone). Then it kind of floated around my collection for what must have been 2 years (?) with NOTHING else, so I finally sold it. Right after I sold it, they kicked up their other D&D stuff, which was all trash. But I'm kind of sad that I got rid of Drizzt. Given that he's supposed to be around 5' tall, he would have fit in really well with something like Savage Crucible where the humans are 7" since Drizzt was just about 6".I honestly was hoping Hasbro would knock it out of the park with their D&D line - a fantasy series as durable and toyetic as Star Wars Black Series, Marvel Legends, or heavens to betsy, Classified? I'd never need a Mythic Legions figures again. But their D&D figures were hot garbage, every single one of them. So for now, they're scratching that itch best. And they have gotten better - the most recent knights are infinitely better than the first generation knights. But I still find QC problems more often than I'd like.
Yeah - I'm still undecided on the Frazetta figures. I like them, but I don't think I need them. Then Eamon just showed off a Conan figure from a totally different company that looks way better. I'm pretty excited about that one. I'm hoping it turns out to be fairly sturdy and playable. I've heard the stuff Eamon is doing is all fairly durable and solid so far.This has me thinking about where I'd put Frazetta or Hacks figures. Frazetta is making works of art too but I fret about breakage (maybe unnecessarily). Both lines feel less... hefty than ML. But basically all my prettiest fantasy figures give me heartburn that I might damage them.
Wait, why?
Not to derail the thread, but I FORGOT about Drizz't and I literally have him on the desk in front of me - they DID nail that figure. TWICE! The second version is even better! If they made all their figures that quality I'd be raving about the line. And to be fair, their monsters are actually very fun. The human/humanoids are gawdawful though, but Drizz't, his panther whose name I refuse to try to spell, the displacer beast, and the beholder are all kinda chilling in my office. The owlbears were sort of TOO toyish so I like 'em but not enough to display them. And to stay on topic, they really don't look like they belong on the shelf with Mythic Legions--there's just a ... sharpness the Hasbro ones lack next to the ML stuff I think?I LOVED Hasbro's first Drizzt figure (except for his super weird skin tone). Then it kind of floated around my collection for what must have been 2 years (?) with NOTHING else, so I finally sold it. Right after I sold it, they kicked up their other D&D stuff, which was all trash. But I'm kind of sad that I got rid of Drizzt. Given that he's supposed to be around 5' tall, he would have fit in really well with something like Savage Crucible where the humans are 7" since Drizzt was just about 6".
I have a few of the Frazetta figures and to be fair, I REALLY like them, especially Dark Wolf. And they DO scale well with Legions, though they are a leaner, meaner body type (but adds variety). I waited til the last day to order their Conan and was totally wooed by the stop motion advertisement they made for it. I'm legit looking forward to having him lead a charge with some of the ML barbarian types. (Even though I skipped their Viking.)Yeah - I'm still undecided on the Frazetta figures. I like them, but I don't think I need them. Then Eamon just showed off a Conan figure from a totally different company that looks way better. I'm pretty excited about that one. I'm hoping it turns out to be fairly sturdy and playable. I've heard the stuff Eamon is doing is all fairly durable and solid so far.
Is all their shit anthropomorphic? I don't mind a little fuzzy dude here or there—in fact, I'm eagerly awaiting 4H's little fox dude—but nothing turns me off like a toy line full of tiger people.I bet Savage Crucible will.
No. I've got a pic of my figures in the Savage Crucible thread. The first wave was lizard people, and the third wave is fish people. But the second (current) wave is barbarian guys. And they're doing Elric of Melnibone. And there's a dwarf and a goblin they've shown off but haven't been slotted into the line-up anywhere yet.Is all their shit anthropomorphic? I don't mind a little fuzzy dude here or there—in fact, I'm eagerly awaiting 4H's little fox dude—but nothing turns me off like a toy line full of tiger people.