I keep meaning to post here and forgetting.
As someone who grew up watching basketball in the early aughts, we're so spoiled right now. You can watch a game featuring Jokic, the greatest player in the world, followed by a game with LeBron and Luka against a swarming, athletic team led by Anthony Edwards, perhaps the best young player in the league. We didn't have any of this quality in 2004.
I felt in my bones that both Detroit and Minnesota were going to win in upsets, though I was too cowardly to pick either of them. I would've been right about one and wrong about the other, so no harm, no foul I guess.
I found the Lakers disappointing. I can't understand why they had so much trouble scoring in the fourth all series. LeBron might be too old, but Luka should've been able to carry the scoring alone in a few games. If JJ wasn't going to trust Knecht in the playoffs, why not trade him for Mark Williams during the regular season? I couldn't understand the strategy in game four, either. I'm a rest/rotation guy in any sport. Surely you can squeeze a few minutes out of Hayes, Vincent, and Vanderbilt? They're all decent NBA players. I wouldn't want them out there in the last two minutes, but they can buy your 40-year-old star a few minutes of rest.
Detroit/NYK and Denver/LAC have been phenomenal. As I post this, it looks like Clippers/Nuggets is heading a game seven. That should be unbelievable, even if neither team has a great shot against OKC.
Bill Simmons has been bullish on Indiana's chances against Cleveland. I don't see it. I think the Cavs and Celtics will win in 6.