Tracking toy tariffs

The downward descent of this thread spirals on just as Godwin's Law would predict.
So, enlighten us all on how this administration is not pulling Third Reich stunts. Because as sick and tired of the actual Nazis as I am, I am equally as sick and tired of people like you denying their existence. Because you've not said anything of any substance yet that refutes the claim. You'd rather let everyone here know that you hold this sanctimonious viewpoint.

-Calling the press "The Enemy of the People".
-Referring to immigrants as animals, dehumanizing them, saying they are poisoning the blood of the country.
-Suing news sources for reporting unfavorable things about him.
-Kidnapping people off of the streets and sending them to foreign prisons, leading to their deaths.
-Dismantling government entities that hold him in check.

Sorry, did you think I was referring to Trump? These are all acts committed by Hitler.

Ask yourself this question: if not Nazis, why supported by white supremacy groups? KKK, Proud Boys, etc? Why do they support and follow in such large numbers? Why does he target brown people in such frequency? If I'm being hyperbolic, stop quoting idiotic online edicts, and explain to me how so. How are they NOT Nazis?

"No one has ever been as dangerous to this country as Donald Trump … Now I realize he’s a total fascist. He is the most dangerous person to this country.”--General Mark Milley
 
Last edited:
I'm mad at Democrats for not even bringing a knife to a gun fight. They showed up with a strongly worded letter to a warzone.

What do you want them to do? They got swept in the last election.

A ton of them wanted to fight the debt ceiling for the first time ever with no viable plan for what they would do with the government shut down, nor any recognition that shutting the government down makes DOGE's job even easier than it already is. Schumer looked like the adult in the room on that fight, but I realize most Democrats disagree.
 
Okay... I'm going to quote captaincracker here and respond to that. But I want to be clear about the intention here. CC's post seemed very much like a 'signing off' message, and I'm working under the impression that he won't be posting here again and likely won't be reading any of this. And that's fine. I feel like a response is still warranted for anyone else that may think as he does and stumble across this, because I think the response itself is important and worthwhile.

So again, I don't expect this matters or will be seen by the person that posted it, but I'll respond for posterity, I guess.


I read through this thread and was debating whether I should reply. I don't post much and even if I did, I realize nobody would care about what I have to say. The very first post stated "Hoping we can all be civil in our discussions" and while everyone has been in agreement, there have been some horrible things said. I have no interest in discussing politics with anyone online since it's simply not fun and there's almost zero chance it will change anyone's mind.

I'm apparently one of those evil, stupid, easily manipulated Nazis with no empathy, because I voted for Trump. It has been made very clear that I am not welcome on these boards for that simple fact. That being said, I honestly feel sorry for some of you. The horrible things being said and even advocating for the death of people who have too much money. It's kind of shocking and I wouldn't want to live with such anger in me.

I have no hatred for anyone and I'm a very empathetic person. I had a good career in IT that I gave up years ago to become a nurse. I did that solely because I wanted to be able to help people and make their lives better. I may not like a lot of what Trump does, but I like even less of the other side. If all we do is hate each other, there is no chance this country will survive.

Again, I don't have any interest in discussing political beliefs and I have no problem with anyone who has different beliefs than me. Thank you to TSI for starting these boards and giving people a place to get together while The Fwoosh was down. I wish you the best of luck.

Quite honestly, and without malice, this entire post is incredibly disingenuous. The first paragraph is self-deprecation almost certainly intended (maybe even unconsciously) to illicit sympathy, followed up by 'I don't want to discuss politics' in a thread that's literally all about politics (yes, tariffs are always political - so you jumped into a thread about politics to complain about what you saw in the thread about politics when you don't want to discuss politics.... and then you go on to discuss politics for the rest of your post). Disingenuous and, in fact, subtly manipulative.

More disingenuous commentary in the opening sentence of the very next paragraph. Even to be generous you'd have to call that hyperbole. But what it really is is putting words in peoples' mouths as a straw man. It's dishonest to say you are apparently an 'evil, stupid, easily manipulated Nazi with no empathy.' Because what you're doing is combining a number of traits suggested of people that voted for Trump. I don't think anyone, and certainly not myself, suggested that all Trump voters are ALL of those things at once. So it's dishonest to suggest that's what anyone said.

More dishonesty in stating that anyone suggested people be killed 'for having too much money.' Although I will grant this, if you are a Trump supporter because you're stupid - then I can also chalk this comment up to being stupid. Because you'd have to be stupid (or dishonest) to think the problem with the wealthiest people on earth is 'they have too much money.' It's not even fair to call that statement reductive, because it isn't even starting from the underlying argument in order TO be reductive of it. Also a bit weird for the guy that voted for one of the most hateful people on earth to talk about other people having 'anger in them.' All Donald Trump does is publicly plot vengeance against everyone that he deems to have wronged or insulted him in any way. He called for the execution of the Exonerated Six. All that dude does is spout absolute hatred in every direction. But sure... I'm the one living with 'such anger.'

Words matter. But so do actions. You can say that you have no hatred in you. But if you vote for someone literally filled with hate for so many different groups of people - then you DO hate. You just hide it behind letting someone else do the hating for you. That's still hate, my dude. At least I have the balls to hate who I hate openly and honestly with my own voice.

The 'other side' stuff is also so INCREDIBLY disingenuous. You like the 'other side' even less than Donald Trump? So you're telling me that -something- the Democrats have done in the last several years is WORSE, to you, than disappearing human beings without due process, as provided for in our Constitution, and shipping them to a torture prison -- and then admitting they messed up and sent at least one totally innocent person, and then saying they also won't be trying to get him back? What did the Dems do that is -WORSE-, in your mind, than dismantling every social program the United States has while ignoring laws and the Constitution?
Which Democratic presidential nominee was it, remind me, that did something WORSE than being a convicted felon that was also found civilly liable for RAPE. Explain that to me. Slowly and use small words because I think I might get confused.

And ultimately I think the disingenuous nature of a post like this one boils down to the intent. The intent to say that people not on the Right are making someone else feel unwelcome because they voted for Trump. That really we're the bad guys because we're so very mean and rude when ALL someone else did is vote for 'the other party.' But how welcome would people feel here if we welcomed everyone and said 'it doesn't matter who you voted for or what your political/social opinions are?' Be honest with me. Be honest with yourself. If I invited my gay best friend to be part of this community but made sure to point out that we also welcome and don't judge people that campaign against his very existence - do you think he would feel welcome here? Or do you think he would call us complicit in the attempted erasure of people like him?

It can't be both. You can't complain about not being welcome in some spaces while voting for people that want occupants of those spaces dead or imprisoned. And you will never, despite the poor attempt at emotional manipulation, make me feel bad for not making a Trump supporter feel welcome. I will listen. I'll debate. I'll hear every single point and tell you why you are wrong when I feel that's the case (probably a lot). I'll spend way too much of my time trying to make you see the error of your positions. But I will never WELCOME anyone that votes to hurt the people I love. Which is exactly what a vote for Trump was.

To put a finer point on the 'stupid or a Nazi' thing - explain it another way. You either didn't know what Trump was despite it being one of the most important and constant news elements of the last 10 years (so.. stupid), you believed all of his constant lies despite how ludicrous most of them are and how easily disproved they are (stupid), you are so terrified, for NO reason, of immigrants and trans people that you voted to have them exterminated (stupid AND cruel), or you understood everything Trump said and simply agreed with it (Nazi/Nazi-sympathizer). Explain the other motive and I'll hear it.
 
I'm a 45 year old Catholic, husband and father to beautiful 7 and 4 year old girls. I teach 4th grade. My wife is Lutheran, girls baptized Lutheran, they attend my Catholic school (I just learned I will be teaching my 7 year old next year, one year earlier than I was anticipating). I'm politically conservative and religiously liberal. In the past I've voted Republican, Democrat, and 3rd party. I need my candidate to have ideas and solutions, not an R or a D. If I feel our two party system does not provide that, I'll do my own research and vote for a 3rd party candidate that aligns more closely (not completely) with what I feel is important.

I have a wife, parents, in-laws, coworkers, friends.....some voted Trump, some voted Harris. They are the most kind and loving people you will meet. None of them are Nazis and I feel we ought not throw around that word in particular, we ought not paint people with so broad a brush. I feel doing so diminishes those few people left alive today whose lives were impacted by real Nazis. You may hate Trump. Call him "Emperor Dipshit", call him "Tangerine Palpatine", that's fine. But this country is not run by a Nazi regime and the fact that you CAN say those things about him, the fact that people can make and post videos like the one above, criticizing the government is proof of that. Boarder enforcement is not Nazism. Looking at the books to find government waste is not Nazism. I think these tariffs suck, I think it's a ham-handed implementation, I think at best it puts a nail into the coffin of the hobby and at worst harms families and small businesses. It's not Nazism.

In general I believe in boarders and enforcing those boarders. Every country in the world does it. I'm sympathetic to those coming from shit hole countries wanting to contribute and provide a better life for their families, I believe they should have the opportunity to be here, but I also believe turning a blind eye to the legal process of being here is dangerous. At the same time, I've taught wonderful students from kind, loving families who I suspect are not here legally. Am I going to drop a dime to ICE? Do I want "jackboots" to drag them apart? Hell no. I pray for them and their situation.

Unfortunately for the good people of the United States, we live in a two party system. Those two parties are primarily concerned with their stranglehold on power and not the prosperity of those beneath them. Voters need to make a choice that is not black and white. I have Catholic family members who are against abortion but have voted Democrat. Are they "baby killers"? No. They were presented with two (usually bad) choices and they chose what they felt was the lesser of two evils. The past year the people of this country were shopped two terrible alternatives to Trump. When the only two choices you give Americans are two extremes, that's not going to end well. People start to look at choices that are not black and white as black and white and you start the division amongst kind and good people and pit them against each other. That's a bad thing.

I want to push back on a couple of things here - because I don't think we need to say 'not all Trump supporters are Nazis.' That's already been covered. There's other reasons. They're just not GOOD reasons. What I don't agree with is the argument against naming a thing. Not every single person that voted Trump is a card-carrying Nazi. But Trump is. Many people in his inner circle very much are. It's not a questionable thing. It's not just trying to find the most hurtful slur to throw at them. Stephen Miller and Bannon, for example, are PROUD Nazis (Christo-fascist white supremacists make you feel better?). There is no debate to be had on that matter. It's just true.

It's also true that Trump has had the complete (near-complete) support of every Neo-Nazi/White Nationalist terrorist group in the US, including the KKK. That's not just people trying to be mean and say mean things. It's literally true.

So there's nothing wrong, and everything right, with calling Nazism when you see it. Because that's what it is. And if we can't name a thing, then words don't have meaning anymore. But really, we can't name a thing because it makes people uncomfortable. But you have to live with the uncomfortable truths just as much as we have to live with the fact that certain types of people can support Nazism without being Nazis. At least, at first. But again, none of the reasons for doing so are good or virtuous reasons. They're just reasons other than 'I am also a huge Nazi.'
It's also worth pushing back on two big Republican talking points that are total bullshit; "enforcing borders" and "it's not fascism if you can say it's fascism without being killed." To the first point; enforcing our borders isn't what we're doing. As many commentators in the political word have said - what Donald Trump is doing is cruelty for cruelty's sake. The US had border enforcement LONG before ICE even existed. That is a fact. Until we started illegally kidnapping people and shipping them to a foreign torture prison, we had constantly-fluctuating border crossing numbers. Trump bragged about the fewest crossings in 2017, but 2018 and 2019 crossings were WAY up. He's just a liar that only points to statistics he likes and thinks make him look good.

But again, the US has enforced its border effectively (or at least as effectively as today, minus the massively illegal and psychotic behaviour by the federal government) for decades and decades with less cruelty and targeted harassment. So why do it? Because the cruelty is the point. ICE doesn't even need to exist, unless someone is going to argue that we didn't have any border security before 2003. C'mon.

The thing about being able to say what you want means it's not Nazism/fascism is also just massively wrong. Go look at the famous comparison picture between women on a beach in 1970s Iran, and women on a beach in modern Iran. Just because you have a right at this specific moment does not mean someone isn't actively working to take it from you. Full authoritarian control doesn't happen in a month or two. But when you have a president saying the media is the enemy and targeting anyone that says things he doesn't like and forcing compliance from law firms -- how long before you CAN'T say whatever you want on the news anymore? How long before all news is just state run propaganda? He literally attacks reporters every single time they're within earshot of him. You do realize what he's doing when he does that, right?

Just like many things he does - it's right out of Hitler's playbook. And that's NOT hyperbole. It's quite literal and needs to be taken seriously.
Think of it this way, because I believe you're probably a good person. You wouldn't want families torn apart by jack-booted thugs. But Donald Trump does want that, and is actively pursuing that. And has found people more than willing to put those boots on and 'just follow orders.' Remember the last time someone just followed orders despite being something no one believes a good-hearted person would do to another human being?

Also, for the record, Trump has talked lots about deporting legal immigrants. In fact, many of the immigrants he talks about deporting are Dreamers or refugees. Trump abuses the fact that many Americans don't actually understand the process of immigration, which allows Trump to blanketly claim that anyone that came here without a visa is 'illegal.' That's not how any of it works, though.

I'd also, if you're still reading this, like to push back on two more things; voting Democrat doesn't make you a baby-killer because Democrats aren't forcing people to have abortions. It's not a good comparison at all. If you voted for someone that said 'I'm going to shoot every baby in the face if I become president' - then yes, you are a baby-killer by proxy if you vote for that person and they follow through. Not the same thing at all.

Also it's silly to say that Americans were given 'two extremes' for choices. Kamala Harris was only an 'extreme' choice to racists and misogynists. She was SO centrist that it's physically painful to watch people call her Left-Wing. Sometimes I wonder if anyone in the United States on the Republican side of things actually knows what a far left 'extremist' looks like. It ain't a career prosecutor with the full weight of the Democratic party behind her, I can tell you that. Also, I think you would struggle to ever convince me that ANYTHING the Democrats have ever suggested for policy is so extreme that it justifies voting for the human version of a YouTube rage-bait video screaming about anything even remotely progressive and threatening to jail or kill (or, you know, disappear to a foreign torture-prison) anyone he doesn't like. Hell, as I said earlier above, you'd be hard-pressed to convince me how good Christian voters can think the 'maybe better medical access and don't put children in cages on the border' party is more extreme and unacceptable than voting for the rapist felon.

I still believe there's value in talking about this stuff. I believe in rehabilitation and change (which is why I don't believe in most forms of long-term imprisonment). I appreciate that, if you got this far, you were willing to share your thoughts respectfully and I hope you took something of value from my response.


(A new record for me -- my post was so long I had to split up my two responses -- hence the double-posting.)
 
Careful. We don't want to upset anyone by venturing into Godwin's Law, because calling it by what it is is forbaden for the sake of appearance. 🙄
 
I think the new Godwin's Law should refer to 'Far Left.' I'm so sick of seeing that term thrown around to describe people that like... are basically just lightweight Capitalists. These fucking people have NO idea what Far Left actually means and it's a completely reactionary term anyway since all they really wanted was to deflect from the rise of the actual and legitimate Far Right terminology.
 
The downward descent of this thread spirals on just as Godwin's Law would predict.
Can't imagine why anybody would go to that place. It's a real chin-scratcher.

Elon_Musk_gesture.gif


 
because I believe you're probably a good person
Thanks. I choose to believe that about every person here.

I appreciate that, if you got this far, you were willing to share your thoughts respectfully and I hope you took something of value from my response.
I did get that far. Thanks for your respectful responses to my thoughts, and indeed I did.


See you all in the toy talk.
 
Folks, let's all take a deep breath and bring the temperature down a few degrees.

When I set this place up, moderation barely occurred to me. (I honestly didn't know if anyone would join, but that's an aside.)

I didn't think about how I'd manage political discussions. I knew I'd allow them because not talking about politics is how we got in this mess. We don't talk to one another anymore, except, ironically, through screens. Politics as a taboo hurts us all.

No one is at risk of being banned. I'm not going to lock this thread. But I did receive our first reported post today in this thread. I almost said something this morning, before the post was reported, but I wasn't sure how I wanted to handle it.

I think everyone here has good intentions. We're all passionate about political issues, and with good reason. Remember: our first rule here is to be kind. Defend your position. Make your point. But do it respectfully. There appear to be mostly leftists among us. I'm thrilled about that. But we've all been in the minority somewhere. Let's not dogpile. There's a person on the other side of the screen. I don't know if anyone is changing their politics based on what someone said on a toy forum, but if they are, those points were made civilly. Don't post out of anger.

If we can, let's keep non-tariff-related talk in the Politics thread. This place is big enough to where we can separate the discussion about how tariffs hurt our hobby from the way the current administration is infringing on our rights. Thanks.
 
These are anecdotal I'm sure but two things happened to me personally since this regime came into power that make me nervous. Aside from everything we see on the news every day, of course. Feel free to mock at your leisure, I suppose.

I took a new job in January and wound up having to fly to VA for a meeting. I had not been on an airplane since well before 9/11. Tried to get my precheck stuff done but didn't have time between hire date and the flight, so I was pretty nervous about TSA. Flew out of Atlanta on inauguration day early in the morning before the swearing in etc - zipped through TSA like nothing. On the flight back something about my ID tripped a big enough flag that they had to call over a supervisor to let me proceed. I'm a middle aged, middle class white dude with zero criminal history outside of a few speeding tickets, but a lot of my social media is decidedly anti-the-folks-who-just-took-power-and-promised-to-go-after-their-enemies.

The other was I read about a book called American Kompramat which espouses that the Russian connection to our current leader is nothing new. There was a moderate kerfuffle going on because all mention of the book seemed to be disappearing from many Western news outlets in one concentrated swoop. I went and bought the book on Audible - and for the first and only time ever (as someone who has around 700 books through Audible) when I clicked the button to purchase my screen flashed at me several times.

Yes, I know I'm paranoid. But I sure as heck hope I don't have to fly again any time soon.
 
They both like trolling, but Musk LOVES it.
So they're only "pretending" to be fascists? Fascist cosplayers? For the lulz?

If their main move is to pretend to be some of the worst people in history, why on earth should someone not compare them in other actions, which often also align with fascist goals? These are the same folks sending people to actual lightless gulags without due process for simply having tattoos of any kind. Who are currently talking about doing it to citizens. They're perfectly happy ruining people's lives based on appearance, but when they "troll" somehow making the comparison they're begging for is incorrect?

You dropped Godwin's Law, but you do realize Godwin himself has things to say about this.

Here's a key point about Godwin's Law form the man himself:

"I’ve never said that just because you’re invoking the Nazis you’re losing the argument. If you’re going to compare somebody to Hitler or the Nazis or raise the specter of the Holocaust, be sure you’ve got your facts right. But there’s nothing categorically wrong with Biden’s — or anyone else’s — comparison of Trump calling people vermin or talking about blood poisoning to Hitler."

The comparison does not mean you are wrong, or that your argument is poorly constructed, the law merely describes it's prevalence in online rhetoric. People use it as a way to win arguments even when it's not relevant, but there are actual fascists in the world.
 
Back
Top