U.S. Politics

Damien said:
Interestingly, the main argument I've seen against the word isn't that it's performatively macho, but that it's actually incredibly reductive and dishonest, since most of what the military does is not actually fighting wars.
Click to expand...
Yes that too.

I just . . . if someone came up to me and said “I’m a warfighter”, I’d instantly double over on guffaws. I wouldn’t be able to help it. It’s like if I insisted on saying “I’m a stage taker” instead of an actor or “I’m a mind dissector” instead of a counselor. Or like “I’m wearing slain animals on my body” instead of “this is a leather jacket”.

Does “military personnel” not cover it adequately?
 
AceofKnaves said:
Yes that too.

I just . . . if someone came up to me and said “I’m a warfighter”, I’d instantly double over on guffaws. I wouldn’t be able to help it. It’s like if I insisted on saying “I’m a stage taker” instead of an actor or “I’m a mind dissector” instead of a counselor. Or like “I’m wear slain animals on my body” instead of “this is a leather jacket”.
Click to expand...
Haha.. 100%. That's another complaint about it; it's just stupid. It sounds stupid to anyone above a 5th grade education. But I mean, I kind of have that problem with lots of words we use; don't get me started on 'washing machine.' How fucking lazy are we?

To be fair, though, it's not a self-descriptor. I think that's why it's so weird to hear a person say it out loud like Hegseth did in the context he used it. It's more of an internal thing. I can't imagine anyone ever saying 'I'm a warfighter.' Just beyond how stupid it sounds, most people in the military are at least somewhat proud of their branch and would say they're a marine, or an airman, or whatever.

That being said, I have no idea if they're still looking for a new word of if the DOD has just settled on that one and everyone is just stuck with it. It is somewhat fitting for the likes of Hegseth and Trump to refer to their military people as 'warfighters.' Or maybe 'shooty guys.'
 
AceofKnaves said:
Honestly this would be easier for me to swallow; at least it acknowledges the infantilism of it all.
🤣
Click to expand...
I just see Trump and Hegseth, totally big important man serious faces, leaning over a tactical map. Dramatic music in the background.
Trump: We cannot allow them to get to our positions. We'll need to put our shooty guys right here. ~stabbing a finger at the map~
Hegseth: Sir, they'll be wiped out. They have no armored support. We can't sacrifice our warfighters like this. I just got them all sweet new vests with like.. wolves on them. Because they're lone wolves. All of them. Like a pack of lone fuckin' wolves, sir.
Trump: ~placing hand on Hegseth's shoulder~ They can do this, Pete. I just got special force fields for all the shooty guys. If someone pow-pows at them, they just go nuh-uh because of the force field and they don't die. But they also have the super bullets so they can shoot other shooty guys that have force fields.
Hegseth: You're a genius, sir. I think I might be in love with you. If I were lucky enough to be a woman that you sexually assaulted, I would be proud to carry your babies.
Trump: They'd be stupid. Like Eric. But no one would be able to shoot them. Because of the force field.
 
I just want the moment where Trump is the twerpy traitor from The Last Starfighter and looks over at Hegseth and says “what do we do now?” And Hegseth, as the alien dude with the weird cyber-monocle, goes “WE DIE”.
*BOOM*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top