SDCC Exclusive Savage Land 3 pack (Rogue, Sauron, Shanna)

I agree with Norm, I think the Savage Land set is an 8.5, but I would give Psylocke a 7 or 7.5, if I'm being generous. She loses at least 1 point because I don't care much for the new ML female body. I do like her head sculpts and the raised surfaces of her wraps.

As an old guy who never used "mid" before in a sentence, "often used to (humorously) insult someone or something as bad, boring, or inferior in some way, especially when other people regard that person or thing as excellent or high quality." That's the new ML female buck.
 
The second set may just stay in my collection as a MIB piece. I saw the previous offers for Rogue and Shanna, but if no one was going to ask for Sauron, I wasn't going to break up the set and get stuck with one. At least one of those offers found what they were looking for elsewhere, so I'm just going to keep it.
I'm still looking for the whole set.

Assuming Hasbro is still radio silent on this fiasco?

For anyone wanting a red-headed Shanna, might this be a good use for that Siryn head no one likes? The flowing hair at least could look great.
 
MvC Psylocke gets a 10/10 from me. Could probably drop it to a 9.8 or so since she has only one grip and one fist. Need the other corresponding grip and fist.
 
MvC Psylocke gets a 10/10 from me. Could probably drop it to a 9.8 or so since she has only one grip and one fist. Need the other corresponding grip and fist.

Yeah, Psylocke is a 10/10 for me, too. Such a great figure. Love the head sculpts, articulation, strong proportions, and effects.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Psylocke is also a 10/10 for me. She's not perfect, but I struggle to think of many ways to improve her. I think she holds up well relative to other action figures lines, too.
See also: gaming where 7/10 score on reviews and Metacritic means a game is trash , when a 7/10 is by definition Above Average.
This is a tough one. I think the American grading system has broken our brains here. To me, a 7/10 is average. It does some things well and other things poorly, or it's mediocre across the board.

There's a movie cataloging/reviewing social media site called Letterboxd. Users rate movies from 1/2 to 5 stars. The most average movie you could think of has an average score of 3.5 while a 2.5 is reserved for bad movies. IMDb is the same. Average shows/movies hover around a 7.

The only bad thing is that it forces all the good movies to fall in the three scores (4, 4.5 and 5) between average (3 or 3.5) and the max score (5). Not a lot of room for nuance there while the bad movies could score 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, or 2.5.
 
This is a tough one. I think the American grading system has broken our brains here. To me, a 7/10 is average. It does some things well and other things poorly, or it's mediocre across the board.

And I follow this logic myself. But just for fun, most places do explain their scale, so it becomes an interesting friction of intent and opinion.

https://corp.ign.com/review-practices

Here, IGN editorially considers it "time well spent", and your read would be a 6 or 5 but their methods. It doesn't help that other places weigh things differently, and it doesn't help that a 3.5 is not necessarily a 7, or 70 is not a 7.

Just to add to your point because I agree with you, I think another critical flaw is no one reads the texts to understand why the conclusion was reached, it's just about scrolling down to the number and then finding the tribalism that works for you thanks to corporate fanboyism and franchise loyalty. We live in a world where people form their opinions off of the previews or prior experiences and want those opinions to be justified in the future, because I don't think modern society can handle criticism or change if it makes them incorrect or susceptible to growth.

Funny anecdote about myself:

Growing up in America under the American school system, as a military brat who moved around, the grading scales constantly shifted for me, but I was quite used to a 92 or 93 and up being A work throughout school. And anything less than a B was... Not rewarded with my parents.

Decades later returning to College to change my career in Canada - decades later as a full ass adult with an army stint, nursing, and adult experiences and problems under my belt - I spent the first year of a program scoring high 80s. And I couldn't understand why none of the work I was doing was A work. Stressed me out. Drove me to try harder. I was just programmed to want that A work. And every time, 80s.

It was not until the conclusion of the first year then I even looked at the grading scale, where I discovered 80 to 100 was A work.

The stress I placed upon myself dissolved.

And I also stopped caring and working as hard because as long as I got an 80, which was almost impossible not to do as long as you hit the rubric, I was getting "an A", and could call myself an A student.

So yeah: Broken my brain, indeed. :)
 
All of this drama, and the figures themselves are kind of mid.

I like Shanna and Rogue more than Psylocke. Mid.

. After all that, I thought she was just okay.
What I'm reading here is Hasbro uses FOMO to sell MID toys to MIDdle aged men.

"Ana de Armas is mid" means they think they can pull more attractive,
I love these comments because it's a tell that I can immediately dismiss anything they have to say about any topic because their brain is warped.

Assuming Hasbro is still radio silent on this fiasco?
There's nothing for them to say. "We didn't know an SDCC exclusive would be so popular. We released it in the most bare minimum of drips and drab in the smallest of windows in the wee hours of the morning to generate hype for an average release. We'll do better next time, sorry, guys." It's not important to me that they officially give us some variation of this statement.

MvC Psylocke gets a 10/10 from me.

Yeah, Psylocke is a 10/10 for me, too.

Psylocke is also a 10/10 for me. She's not perfect, but I struggle to think of many ways to improve her.
Psylocke gets a 9/10 for me.

10/10 is perfect but she's not that. The flesh tones on her torso don't match her legs and arms. That's a minor issue for me. Hasbro could have gone full Hasbro on this figure, given us no sculpted detail, tampoed on all of her straps, gotten infinite reuse out of this, and it STILL would have created the same buzz, she still would have sold us an unwanted Thanos. As it stands, they can resell her in her retro card reissue, maybe an Electra, that's about it. They went a little bit above and beyond what they normally do and she's so much nicer because of it. I'll still call her my favorite ML of the year.
 
Last edited:
IGN used to be my favorite video game print magazine.
I prefer ML Psylocke over my Mafex and Amazing Yamaguchi. I'm not a respected reviewer like Anthony of Anthony Customs, but if I were to say an ML Psylocke was a 10/10, then other figures would have to be at least an 11?
 
Surely you mean EGM?

IGN is a web empire spawned from IGN64. I was there, Gandalf.
Next Generation. I don't know why I associated them with IGN. I was also a regular buyer of EGM. I guess it's been a long time.
I'm a lapsed videogamer, haven't played anything this year or been a regular player in years.

I might still have this one after I got rid of all my magazines. I hear the Nintendo Powers are sought after?

Screenshot-20250812-092414-074.png
 
There's nothing for them to say. "We didn't know an SDCC exclusive would be so popular. We released it in the most bare minimum of drips and drab in the smallest of windows in the wee hours of the morning to generate hype for an average release. We'll do better next time, sorry, guys." It's not important to me that they officially give us some variation of this statement.
That's not what I want or expect to hear - I want to hear them say they are going to offer it again to all the customers they screwed over with a second production run.
 
I can't rate MvC Psylocke, because every time I find a store in the area showing some in stock, the employees can't find any.

Fuck you very much, Hasblow. Fucking assholes.
 
Next Generation. I don't know why I associated them with IGN. I was also a regular buyer of EGM. I guess it's been a long time.
I'm a lapsed videogamer, haven't played anything this year or been a regular player in years.

I might still have this one after I got rid of all my magazines. I hear the Nintendo Powers are sought after?

Screenshot-20250812-092414-074.png
Loved those covers.

EGM, Next Gen, and Game Players were my staples, then Official PlayStation Magazine dropped in the mix for those sweet discs.

Also shout out to Game Informer, which picked up all that slack.
 
Sensitive to everyone who wasn't able to order one, and I hope they figure out how to make whatever the production run was available. A made to order run would probably make the most sense. That said, my miracle sets arrived and I'm very happy with Shanna, Rogue and Sauron. Would be fantastic and well-regarded single carded releases. Definitly not "mid" (jesus). I have to assume Shanna will get releases somewhere down the line again. Sauron is also a solid upgrade on the BAF release.
 
I still haven’t received a shipping notice. I suppose that’s karma. 😉

I am sincerely happy that everyone seems to be enjoying them.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top