- Joined
- Apr 2, 2025
- Messages
- 2,175
If someone showed me the greyscale with no context beyond 'its a battle nun' and asked me to paint it; it would be mostly black with some white to break it up and definitely a few gold or silver accents. I mean... that's just what makes sense, regardless of any concerns about not having enough color breaks. Plenty of action figures are fairly monotone.Yeah... I think I'll be buying at least one of the nuns - I like both of the heads without the gas mask, so I might buy 2 - but I might just paint the flesh parts black. It seems like that would have been an easy choice, but maybe they were afraid it would look too monolithic or blah without a secondary color too break it up.
100% I don't buy into the 'cheapens the music' stuff anyway. To me there's no legitimate argument there. A band either plays good music or they do not. You can't hide bad playing with spectacle because they are separate things. KISS puts on an incredible show and I still think their music sucks.I'm a big fan of bands doing theatrical stuff, especially when it comes to hard rock & metal. I know many think it cheapens the music, but I don't feel that way. To me, it adds another layer that is highly entertaining. Considering how talented the girls in Dogma are, and how it was basically conceived as a Broadway type show to begin with, I think it is a perfect blend of theater and rock.
Believe it or not, I tend to -not- look at it that way. Because, to be perfectly fair, that is how armor works. Most people wearing armor do leave massive patches of skin exposed. Look at a modern soldier and how much of their body is actually protected. Modern plate carriers don't provide that much coverage, and almost no soldiers wear ballistic masks over their incredibly vulnerable faces.For me, I look at it and think of how impractical it is from a tactical standpoint. Why wear armor when you're leaving massive patches of skin exposed?
A common criticism I have for fantasy artists depicting medieval-esque and ancient-esque warriors is their incessant need to add armor where it was not actually worn. To our modern eye, it looks crazy that someone is 'fully armored' without anything on their lower arms. But that -was- how most warriors from the Classical to the pre-Modern period armed themselves.
I don't even get too mad when the armor/no armor decisions are clearly something inspired by fashion. Because armor also has a history of being inspired by contemporary fashion. So I find it really hard to explain why I don't like certain things beyond 'it just looks bad.'
In this case, looking at the nun; the bare shoulder thing does line up with some contemporary fashion for 'off the shoulder' shirts and such. But A) it doesn't make sense for a nun character, and B) it makes the rerebrace armor look stupid. She's not even wearing clothing on her shoulder, but 2 inches from her shoulder she has this huge strapped-on armored plate? Looks a bit nonsense.
It's also got the MCU problem: Overdesigning every costume until it's just violently fucking your eyeholes. There's nowhere for your eyes to rest because there's just so many lines and details everywhere and it actively makes the entire costume worse.
Also, I'm now noticing that she has like.. armored high heels. And I hate it. I fucking hate that. I get that 'warrior lady in high heels' is a thing. But it is a thing that I despise. Also, she appears to be wearing cross-stitched thigh-high boots under the armored boots? Ugh.
Don't get me wrong, they can make whatever figures they want, however they want. I'm only talking about what I like and not what is objectively correct or good. But for my money, I'd want to take a red pen to this entire design.