One A Day 2.0: Day #190 - Triathlon/3-D Man

[BasilElks]

80s handbook version is high on my list.

 

[AceofKnaves]

Yep. 80s handbook Enforcer would be amazing.

 

[tasmaniantwister]

Definite in for Handbook Enforcer.

 

[Thor-El]

Yes on Enforcer. More classic Handbook for the shelf.

 

[DetectiveHoag]

Here’s another candidate from “easy to do, not done” category. Yes, I’d get him. He’d be an easy cost saver for Hasbro to squeeze in a line somewhere. Hear that Hasbro? Get ‘im done.

 

[Reno]

Yes, I'd buy an Enforcer figure if it was made, but not high on my wishlist.

 

[puckace]

Maybe in a baf wave I wanted. But not high on my list.

 

[canprime]

Yes to Enforcer and that would lead to easy reuse for the Brothers Grimm.

 

[Chooch555]

Yes

 

[Beamish]

Day #191 - Triathlon/3-D Man

Would I buy? YES!
Which version? I prefer his second Avengers costume with the yellow emblem. Hopefully Hasbro would go that extra mile and paint the unique pattern on the bottom of his shoes. His 3-D Man suit is sharp, too.

Classic Avenger. Nuff' said. I'm really surprised he hasn't shown up in an Avengers wave since he can easily be made with existing parts with a new head sculpt. Make it happen Hasbro and check off another classic Avenger!

 

[Thor-El]

Absolutely yes for Triathlon. I want his second costume though (preferably the version without the goggles). I didn’t like his debut suit that much, and REALLY don’t like him as 3-D Man.

 

[Reno]

Yes, I'd happily take any of the versions shown.

 

[TFitz]

Midnight (Midnight Sun) would have to be on discount
Enforcer is a pass
Triathalon is a yes. Makes me want 3D Man.

 

[tasmaniantwister]

A classic Busiek/Perez Avenger-sign me up ! Would take Triathlon in any of his costumes, probably prefer the first or second because they uniquely belong to him. If they did the 3-D Man identity, then include an alternate head for the 1950's 3-D Man and they've started a brand-new team that wouldn't be hard to complete-the 1950's Avengers/Agents of Atlas.

 

[DetectiveHoag]

Sure. Why not?