Mattel DC Figures

So if you started watching, say, the Walking Dead in the middle of the sixth season, how long do you think it would take you to figure out what was going on and who those characters were? It would take a short while, wouldn't it? But if you liked what you saw you would do it.

...you would just start watching from the first season. It's a TV show. It has seasons. You would just scroll to the first episode on whatever streaming service you're using to watch it.

Look, the DC Universe is 90 years old. Marvel is closing in on that. If you've never read a comic before and you want to start, it's going to take a little time to figure out who the characters are and what their history is. But DC is picking up new readers now. It's not impossible.
Because of the Absolute line, which is a publishing line designed to give people versions of the characters where they don't need to slog through Wikipedia to get references. It was a good idea, just like when Marvel created the Ultimate line. It will probably collapse in on itself eventually just like that did, but new-continuity projects and sublines are generally worth pursuing because they give new readers a chance.

Sure. So I just opened another window and went to google. I typed in dc proty explained and this is what I got:

"Proty is a fictional, protoplasmic, shape-shifting alien from the planet Antares II, appearing in DC Comics as the loyal pet of Chameleon Boy in the 30th Century. As a member of the Protean race, Proty possesses telepathic abilities and can transform into any shape or person. Proty is best known for sacrificing its life to save Lightning Lad."

That ... wasn't hard.

Except you know all the references in that passage because you've read tons of Legion, and since you're already committed to the world none of that sounded stupid to you. But that's not even my point. My main point is that if a book requires external sources for clarity on its own characters and concepts, it has a failed as a story in a way that drives readers away. Some books are easier to fail with in that direction than others. The Legion is extremely easy to fail in that way with, which is a barrier to entry that needs to be accounted for when you're launching a new series.

Come on, man. Scott Snyder, Joshua Williamson and Tom King know how to write. You've got all these reasons in your head why the Legion is doomed, JUST DOOMED I TELL YOU, to failure. And really, why don't we all just wait and see what happens? DC's publishing a lot of good stuff right now. They can make the Legion work. Give it a chance.

I didn't say the book would fail, I said it was likely to do the same thing most Legion reboots have done, which is kick around for a while to slowly diminishing interest. That's not failure, that's what most comics do, that's a normal publishing run. But here just to get people to stick around you have to solve a number of core issues with the property that you don't with a lot of other properties:
1. If you're a shared universe reader, it's easy to ignore in the context of DC's line because it's closed off from most other books by its era
2. It has a cumbersome cast of characters that aren't famous even to most comics fans (and again, main competitors like Justice League and the X-Men have deeply familiar characters. They can get away with more here, and JLU is still a bad book despite having a typically good writer largely because the creative team hasn't figured out how to navigate the scope of it)
3. If you're interested in a book that's easy to jump into, its history is a confusing disaster
4. If the idea of a book with a long history to delve into appeals to you, its history is still a confusing disaster
5. Its main selling points for a new reader are deeply unclear, and that's the biggest thing they're going to have to elucidate in both the marketing and the actual composition of the book, because if they go in with their whole idea being "Legion of Super-Heroes revival," they've got nothing

The thing about the Legion is that it doesn't have that much in the way of identity if you haven't been reading it since before the Berlin Wall fell. "Superheroes in the future" is something, but it's not enough when superhero comics are already so routinely futuristic. "Space opera" is another thing, but you have to present a world that provides immediate immersion. If I show you the interior of a Star Wars or Star Trek ship, you'd immediately recognize it as those franchises because their particular futures are so well-defined. Star Wars is lightsabers and X-Wing Fighters and rolling little robots and narrow walkways above impossible chasms. Legion doesn't have that, so the futurism doesn't matter when it's so generic and your potential reader's going to get a Star Wars comic instead. Hell, they don't even really fly spaceships, they have flight rings, so you're missing out on one of the best parts of space adventure!

(My recommendation would probably be a kind of 60s Retro Futurism as a guiding aesthetic principle, because this is not a cool cyberpunk future, it's a gleaming one where you have to buy into terms like "Science Police" with a straight face. Frankly I'd also consider ditching the flight rings for some cool fighter ships or mini-mechs or something for most characters who can't fly naturally, because you're losing out on narrative complications and artistic possibilities by having the tech work way too easily and invisibly. With those rings, you've just made Green Lanterns who are even less cool than Green Lanterns, which seems impossible when Green Lanterns are Narcs from Space who get their marching orders from elderly Smurfs. I'd probably go so far as to make the Legion reliant on cooler but jankier tech because they're in opposition to their gleaming future, because if you've still got mega-rich like R.J. Brande around it's a compromised future and if I know anything about rich people he probably owns not just an island but a whole planet devoted to sex trafficking.)

Well, alright, what about the scale? Lots of characters, lots of crises, lots of planets. Except we've already established that DC's already doing that with a Justice League comic right now, which might not be a good book but it's a book with Batman in it, so I guess that one wins. And pretty much every team comic since The Authority does that scale routinely anyway, let alone crossovers.

Alright then, what about the character dynamics? That's probably the thing I find most meaningful about the book, because it's Teenagers in Space and they should be messy and dramatic, and they get to be that without any adults around unlike present DC teenagers who can't go two issues without Batman making them take a piss test so they can be admitted to a big superhero picnic and eat Jay Garrick's unseasoned potato salad. Spandex soap opera is pretty commonplace, but DC's characters are all one big superhero fraternity at this point so everyone just kind of gets along? And that sucks, that's truly boring. I don't think you need to go full Marvel and have half your superheroes being Randian sociopaths with dueling secret societies or whatever RPG setting Jonathan Hickman is disguising as a script now, but they have a chance with this book to introduce mess and thirst and nuance and friction in a free-rein setting. Which are basically the same benefits you get from doing an Absolute line, so hopefully they learn from why people like those books and adapt some of those lessons here.
 
Last edited:
Speak for yourself. I like reading stories but I also like reading Wikipedia pages about stories, teams or characters. Sometimes you find out something you missed reading the first time. I loved Who's Who and the Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe. I wish they would still update them. I also like the encyclopedias about the DC and Marvel Universes. I read wiki pages when I have some down time at work or am looking up information about a certain character. I've always been a cliff notes person (do they still make those?). Sometimes I'd rather read a summary of a movie or book than actually reading or watching it. If I'm interested in a book, I will read it. If I am interested in a movie or tv show, I will watch it. If I'm curious about a book, movie or tv show, I will read a wiki page about it so I have some general information. I have never seen the Sixth Sense but have heard too many people talk about it, I know about the movie. It doesn't bother me if it is ruined. I have looked up the wiki page about it and know what the movie is about. If I ever watch it, hopefully i will enjoy it.
"Sometimes I'd rather read a summary of a movie or book than actually reading or watching it."

I think it's probably fair to say that most people don't view a movie or book as just an Event Delivery System and that the experience of a story is distinct from the experience of a plot synopsis. The Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe can't replicate the feeling of that passage of Man Without Fear where the panels get progressively tighter and tighter and more repetitive and then explode into that full two-page spread of Matt and Stick on the rooftops because Matt's finally getting a handle on how to navigate his senses and finally feels free, or the crazy headlong first-love rush of Matt chasing Elektra through the city. A character's got to be more than their Who's Who entry.
 
My main point is that if a book requires external sources for clarity on its own characters and concepts, it has a failed as a story in a way that drives readers away.

Well then you don't have a point. If a new reader grabs any old issue of, say X-Men, off the stands right now there's no way in hell they're going to know what's going on. They're going to have to invest some time and effort in trying to get caught up. And it's doable. If it weren't, the X-Men never would have lasted all these years. You say the Legion's history is too convoluted for new people. I say you're wrong. But it's a moot point because this hypothetical new Legion book is going to be a REBOOT. How much of the history will new readers need to know?

You don't like the Legion. You've made a bunch of digs about them. And THAT'S OKAY. Not everybody likes everything. I get it.
 
Well then you don't have a point. If a new reader grabs any old issue of, say X-Men, off the stands right now there's no way in hell they're going to know what's going on. They're going to have to invest some time and effort in trying to get caught up. And it's doable. If it weren't, the X-Men never would have lasted all these years. You say the Legion's history is too convoluted for new people. I say you're wrong. But it's a moot point because this hypothetical new Legion book is going to be a REBOOT. How much of the history will new readers need to know?

You don't like the Legion. You've made a bunch of digs about them. And THAT'S OKAY. Not everybody likes everything. I get it.
It depends on how much they're rebooting. Based on what I've seen in news articles, they seem to be pretty vague about that. "With Mark Waid saying that, despite all the different versions of the team that have existed over the years, the one DC has chosen to use is one he's 'confident everyone will embrace,' no matter when they first got into the group." If I had to guess, they're probably doing one of those things DC likes to do where the characters are both technically new but also merging as much as possible from previous versions into one depiction, because everyone who works for DC has a hoarding problem but for ideas.

I make lots of digs about lots of things. It doesn't mean I dislike something; it means I think something has stupid elements. The Legion has a lot of stupid things about it, and some of those things are awesome stupid and I love them dearly (Karate Kid) and some of those things are plain stupid. It also has cool things about it and plenty of badass characters and moments, and sometimes that includes a tiny alien in a tiny spaceship fighting a terrifying sorceress with a floating eyeball, which is unimpeachable. It's a very large franchise. Which theoretically could be a selling point, but now everything is an overstuffed franchise with multiple versions of every character in it, which is why part of my advice regarding the new series is that they need to really find a lane and presentation that's unique to the book. Being a Legion of Super-Heroes book is not enough in a comics environment where the Legion of Super-Heroes hasn't been a consistently successful property in decades.

Identifying the weaknesses in a property from both market and narrative standpoints doesn't mean I dislike something, nor does roasting Element Lad. That one puts me in a class with Brainiac 5, in fact.
COIE%20shut%20up.jpg
 
Legion has incredible potential for modern appeal, but the audience that would love its goofy as hell teen sci-fi soap opera melodrama the most pays more attention to adaptations and original streaming shows like Young Justice, X-Men '97, MAwS, SPOP, Voltron, etc. I could see a Young Justice-style show working for Legion to on-ramp a whole new audience, alongside a soft reboot comic, but it'd also need Supergirl and maybe Superboy as regular characters to really get the casual crowd invested. (And it should have them, anyways)

X-Men and Legion are extremely similar in theory, but only X-Men has constant support in terms of films, animated series, etc. It also has the benefit of having a definitive "Hey, read this run!" that is almost always in print in some capacity, and current comics that always keep characters close enough to the status quo for people to comfortably pick up the latest books and grasp what's going on. Legion's silver age stories (hard sell for new readers) are currently out of print for 9 years and cost $100+ a volume, it was rebooted several times and has nearly completely overhauled the characters' looks and personalities, and has no adaptation that really brings the characters to a definitive "This is EXACTLY what you should expect from these characters!" in the mainstream. We have several decent adaptations of Brainiac 5, but that's about it. They definitely deserve more and have the potential, and I hope they get more, but it'd take a lot of effort.
 
"Sometimes I'd rather read a summary of a movie or book than actually reading or watching it."

I think it's probably fair to say that most people don't view a movie or book as just an Event Delivery System and that the experience of a story is distinct from the experience of a plot synopsis. The Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe can't replicate the feeling of that passage of Man Without Fear where the panels get progressively tighter and tighter and more repetitive and then explode into that full two-page spread of Matt and Stick on the rooftops because Matt's finally getting a handle on how to navigate his senses and finally feels free, or the crazy headlong first-love rush of Matt chasing Elektra through the city. A character's got to be more than their Who's Who entry.
I see you quoted me and that you also pulled one sentence from my quote. I have explained myself before and after that sentence. Also, I am talking about myself in that sentence and not most people. Everyone has their own ideas and opinions and not everyone agrees. If you read a story and don't know what a word means, do you keep reading the story hoping for an explanation or would you read a dictionary to find out what a word means? The Who's Who, Handbook & Wiki pages are just that, tools to help you understand, just like an encyclopedia. Maybe, some people enjoy reading those types of books just as much as a story book. It might be similar to watching a documentary.
 
Back
Top