Tracking toy tariffs

Do we know that Super7 is actively doing this? With factory production, I would assume there are barriers to operating this way since they must have to pay the factory upfront some amount to begin production. What that amount is I don't know, but I would assume when they closed preorders on that last wave of turtles I assume a chunk of that immediately went to the factory to begin production and upon completion they probably have a remaining balance to pay out.

I don't have a particularly high opinion of how that company is run so nothing would surprise me. I do think there is some element of risk aversion to a lot of what they do which makes me skeptical they would open preorders on one product explicitly to fund another, but people do stupid things when they get desperate. I'm largely left to assume nothing particularly shady is going on with the company and that this is a pretty conventional case of "bad times." Their cashflow has likely been going down as business doesn't appear to be very good from the outside looking in while expenses are rising pretty much across the board. And while it's easy to look at the company as this poorly run entity (which I think it is), few companies budgeted for 145% tariffs on their products. Now, if in light of all of this the company suddenly declares bankruptcy and we find out their most recent closed preorders never went into production then I would certainly be willing to jump to the conclusion that they never intended to go into production and those last few rounds of preorders were done just to generate revenue and then protect themselves from having to pay out via bankruptcy protection. And if that were to happen the individual consumer who preordered product direct would almost surely be boned as bankruptcy court is going to take of those with the largest outstanding balance first likely leaving nothing for the guy who is owed $250.

That Hasbro news is interesting, but probably not good for our hobby. I'm curious if the plan was to raise prices across the board to offset some of the losses to tariffs on products coming out of China, but with the reduction in the tariff amount, maybe they think they can just shift all of the burden specifically to the Chinese products? The article mentions price increases are still likely to happen, just not at the scale previously thought. Obviously, not enough to keep their old plan, but maybe instead of a Legends increase to $35 they think they can do a softer one of just a few bucks. I guess we'll see, but a 30% tariff rate isn't exactly a win just because it's better than 145%. I personally still expect to see a bit of a pause on new production as this thing plays out. Companies are going to rush to get product out of China that was already finished or nearly finished, but may still be hesitant to greenlight a wave of action figures that won't ship until the end of the summer.
Remember, tariffs existed before all of this nonsense started and they weren’t zero so there is already some of that percentage built into the current pricing. I believe it was roughly 20% before so increasing only about 10% above what they used to be is actually good news compared to the 145% it was for a few days there. Hasbro can work with 10% I imagine. Sure that’s something they need to address eventually but if that is the rate that ends up sticking, it should only increase things by a dollar or two on basic figures. So I can see how Hasbro is feeling much better about this new rate than they were last week with 245 looming on the horizon. Hopefully after these 90 days it goes back down to what it was or something even better (optimistic thinking?).
 
Are we sure? Dan Larson was saying tariffs WERE zero before. Originally Trump was doing tariffs last term and then they ended up with an exclusion for toys because it was right before Christmas but then it never took effect.

Unless there was a pre-existing amount before even that?
 
Are we sure? Dan Larson was saying tariffs WERE zero before. Originally Trump was doing tariffs last term and then they ended up with an exclusion for toys because it was right before Christmas but then it never took effect.

Unless there was a pre-existing amount before even that?
Correct, when he enacted tariffs the first time around toys were exempt. We've gone from 0 to 30%. Only question I still have is if everything we here generally collect were all classified as "toys." I'm guessing they are, because who is bothering to really challenge this stuff, but it's possible some specialty items were impacted. Based on that article, Hasbro is still expecting to lose as little as 50M thanks to the 30% tariff which even for a company as large as Hasbro is not nothing.
 
See, I was wanting you to come back and prove I was wrong and you were right because that would mean this all isn't as bad as it is.
I thought I read some graph or article earlier in this thread but I could have very well misinterpreted it. I can’t imagine much of anything came in Scott free until recently. Toys would be a logical exception though since there isn’t much manufacturing being done in the states. At least until LEGO gets moving in 2027.
 
I believe only certain types of products and industries previously had tariffs. Now, it's blanket tariffs for everything, although I believe there are some carve-outs with lower rates. And don't forget the removal of de minimis exemptions means we're being punished for ordering directly from Chinese sellers.

I doubt toys can be manufactured in the USA and keep the prices down to maintain sales.
 
I hadn’t seen that hasbro expected pricing… I’d be out on a lot of hasbro stuff at those prices, sheesh.

I think the only line I like enough to actually absorb those prices now would be Masterverse
 
I hadn’t seen that hasbro expected pricing… I’d be out on a lot of hasbro stuff at those prices, sheesh.

I think the only line I like enough to actually absorb those prices now would be Masterverse
I think a lot of collectors are overestimating how much a price increase to say $30US per figure would slow down sales.

Don't get me wrong, it will of course. However here in Canada we have been paying $35 per figure for quite some time now. Now I am talking about pricing in local currency and not dealing with exchange rates, etc. Because quite frankly we all pay in our local currency most of the time. And while I'm sure it has decreased sales, it hasn't stopped collectors from buying. There have been sellouts of certain figures still as well.

So from what I have seen up here I think you guys will follow the same pattern. Yes people will be more selective. Yes the number of figures sold will decrease. However I don't think things will slow down as much as the current assumption. I think a lot of collectors will just bite the bullet and keep collecting.
 
I guess that goes to show how misleading or just outright confusing all of these reports are o_O
I'm just going to use this as a segue to my question. Whenever I try to stay informed on the politics of the day, I go to one media outlet or another and, with just a little bit of critical thinking and independent thought, I find them to be leaning either right or left. They will give me all the info as long as it's favorable to their "side" and omit things that I hear about from OTHER media outlets that are pretty important to take into consideration. So after a while I just say, "f-this", and give up even trying. Because believe me, I have other things in my personal life to worry about.

So my question is can someone provide me with names of media outlets who provide all the FACTS possible, regardless of favorability to right or left, then let the reader/viewer draw their own conclusions? By God, I won't even ask for two or three, I'll take ONE! Does such a thing exist? I don't know, and if anyone can respond with just a name (or names), I would be grateful.
 
@canprime
I think the problem might be the tariffs won't only affect toys, but everything. A decent amount of collectors might need to make more drastic cuts to toy purchases. One of my first posts here was me complaining about my home/insurance doubling in the last two or three years. Tariffs on cars and parts will like lead to insurance rates going up because cars are costlier to repair and replace. So, there's all these potential ripple effects. Btw, my insurance broker needs to find me a new insurance company by November because my current company is getting out of the personal lines business.

Paul Krugman wrote this morning:
The reality is that we’ve gone from a completely insane tariff rate on imports from China to a rate that’s merely crazy. And China accounts for only a fraction of our imports. Tariffs on everyone else are still at 10 percent, a level we haven’t seen in generations. And there are still other shoes to drop: Trump has, for example, been promising tariffs on pharmaceuticals.
 
Last edited:
I'm just going to use this as a segue to my question. Whenever I try to stay informed on the politics of the day, I go to one media outlet or another and, with just a little bit of critical thinking and independent thought, I find them to be leaning either right or left. They will give me all the info as long as it's favorable to their "side" and omit things that I hear about from OTHER media outlets that are pretty important to take into consideration. So after a while I just say, "f-this", and give up even trying. Because believe me, I have other things in my personal life to worry about.

So my question is can someone provide me with names of media outlets who provide all the FACTS possible, regardless of favorability to right or left, then let the reader/viewer draw their own conclusions? By God, I won't even ask for two or three, I'll take ONE! Does such a thing exist? I don't know, and if anyone can respond with just a name (or names), I would be grateful.
Reuters and the Associated Press. Stay away from any "entertainment" news or 24 hour news (Fox, CNN, MSNBC, OAN, Newsmax, etc).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top