Fletch
Pensive
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2025
- Messages
- 477
Thor, the Dark World (Pt 1)
I may be alone in the universe, but I love Dark World. It's possibly my favorite Thor movie, which is likely a combination of appreciation for it and a sort of low bar as far as Thor movies go. Even after this rewatch it holds up for me. I watched it with a pretty critical eye this time, though, so my notes may seem to be at odds with how much I say I like it.
And it turns out I had so much to say, this forum wouldn't let me do it all in one post. So you get it in 2 parts.
I may be alone in the universe, but I love Dark World. It's possibly my favorite Thor movie, which is likely a combination of appreciation for it and a sort of low bar as far as Thor movies go. Even after this rewatch it holds up for me. I watched it with a pretty critical eye this time, though, so my notes may seem to be at odds with how much I say I like it.
And it turns out I had so much to say, this forum wouldn't let me do it all in one post. So you get it in 2 parts.
- Let's be honest, this is the exact same opening as Thor 1. In the ancient past, the residents of one of the realms makes war on Asgardians, and Thor's ancestor has to beat them into submission. Another lazy flashback that's especially egregious because we already have the battle on Vanaheim if we need to start off with an action scene. Come to think of it, it would also make the aether more of an enigma when Jane finds it, which I think would be fun.
- Still, we get laser elves and space Vikings. If that's all this movie gave us, it would be worth the price. It's such a distinctive setting that really gives the Thor movies their own identity going forward. I loved the concept in He-Man and Krull, and it still holds up.
- Thor has never looked better and never will again. I don't know what this movie's braiding budget was, but they finally figured out Thor's hair, and if the metal circles on his tunic were silver, he'd be absolutely perfect. Hemsworth and Hiddleston still have a masterful ability to flow naturally from neo-Shakespeare to "real world" dialog. You still feel the regalness of them, but with a natural chemistry. Anthony Hopkins, I'm sorry to say, is somehow the worst actor in this movie, and that's including Eccleston. All his scenes felt so flat and rushed, like he didn't want to be there and was just trying to wrap early. At first I thought "oh man, I guess this movie is bad" but then there'd be a great scene between Thor and Jane or Loki and Frigga and I'd realize it was Hopkins all along.
- Jane, unfortunately, is little more than a damsel in distress who occasionally remembered to collapse under the effects of the aether in her body. Her non-aether scenes were, of course, really good. I loved the "real world" human she brought to a lot of it, like the "you told your dad about me?" Darcy, if possible, I like even more here. She's taking a gamble by being the comic relief character, but she had to run things on Earth for a good chunk of the movie, and was up to it. Stellan Skarsgard deserved better, though. He's Stellan Mother-Fucking Skarsgard! He shouldn't be a madman running naked around Stonehenge!?! Storywise, I get that they're showing the impact of having Loki in your mind, but it feels too extreme. I suspect Hawkeye never went through anything like this. By all means, show the PTSD of what happened, I just think Skarsgard AND Sellvig deserved to be treated with some more respect.
- Chris Eccleston gets an entry all his own, because I really want to talk about Malekith. I want to like Eccleston, but he's always so vocal about how much he hates being in roles (like this or Dr. Who) that I wonder why he's even an actor. Still, I thought his performance as Malekith was fine, if very one-dimensional (ironic) and he suffered deeply from not having a conceptualizable plan. Like, he was a dark elf who, eons ago, tried to somehow plunge the universe into darkness. Which is an *idea* sure, but they never convinced me there was a way to do it. They just claimed "aether" and hoped we wouldn't ask questions. I guess the advantage there is that they also don't have to put much effort into explaining how the final battle works. I'm not beholden to Malekith's portrayal in the comics and, in fact, prefer him as the somber figure since it matches his roll as a "dark elf" and makes him different from Loki.
- Jane's pining for Thor was handled way better than Thor's pining for Jane. Thor just moping around during a celebration compared to that really awkward lunch date with Chris O'Dowd. Darcy's "remember that science stuff you never look at any more?" hit so hard. I think Thor's scenes also suffer from never convincing me why Thor was in love with Jane. This is a lingering problem with the first movie, but what we really needed here was some poetry from Thor about how her fleeting life makes her burn brighter in his eyes, or how her quest for truth elevates her above other mortals, or how she's the one who inspired him to change his ways to reclaim his hammer. Something! I'm not a romantic. I'm not just willing to take your word for it that you love her. Tell me why. I honestly wouldn't have minded something similar from Jane. Although it's a little easier to understand why a mortal would become infatuated with a god, I would've welcomed something a bit more personal that clarified that it was deeper than just infatuation.