JakeEkiss
Filthy casual
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2025
- Messages
- 1,609
I can help with this one. Here's a "fun" essay.Lindybeige is also problematic; he's a climate change denier and has expressed some other troubling right-wing views. I have no proof, but I'm fairly confident he has a lot of awful views that he just doesn't talk about. Also, his videos are FILLED with opinion-presented-as-fact, and he's generally terrible at parsing the data he does use.
And here's a totally random sampling of the thoughts in that essay:
A word that simply describes you is only insulting to you if the person you are is bad. If you are bad, then surely you deserve to be insulted, and I would rather that you become good than merely change your name. If you are a good person, then the word which names you is simply a word which names you. A name is a word useful for referring to things. The word negro is seldom used these days, despite its being a useful accurate and unambiguous one which names a type of person. If someone tells you that you should not use the word, then they are, more powerfully than anyone else, suggesting that there is something shameful about being negroid. Is there? If there isn’t, then there can be no offence in using the perfectly good word. The word black by contrast has many negative connotations (black market, black magic, black-leg, blackmail), and, perhaps worse than that, is very ambiguous, since some people include Indians as “blacks” and some don’t (a useless fix for this is to called Indians “Asians”, but “Asians” includes the Chinese). I am a Caucasoid, and you can call me that a thousand times without causing offence. It happens to be true. So what?