General Marvel Legends

In Brazil they revealed an evergreen Andrew Spider-Man release, a BAF Lizard with Eric Larson inspired head, and a Modern She-Hulk body repainted to Red She-Hulk. Not a fan of having 2 different characters straight up re-used the same body, but we are overdue for a new Red She-Hulk
 
I believe that Red She-Hulk has a different top or upper torso than the grey/green She-Hulk source figure.
 
PanchaMaestro said:
I’m going to go out on a limb and venture no one is making any money of significance reviewing toys on YouTube.
Click to expand...
Not sure. There are some who claim it's their one and only full-time job, but I don't know enough about how YouTube pays out to figure out if that's true or not. Many also have additional revenue streams like a Patreon or something similar.
 
For the upcoming FF wishlist most wanted poll, please review any initial posts on that thread and edit if you'd like to remove Triton, Gorgon, Black Bolt and Medusa and replace them with somebody else.
 
joshsquash729 said:
It's just weird to me to rank- or critique in any way- any toy reviewer, to be honest. Like, are there shills? Absolutely, but I can't lie and say that, if some company sent me a freebie, especially of something I was already looking forward to, I wouldn't butter them up a bit more than usual. If something brings you joy and you wanna share it with others, why not? I try to keep most of my reviews that I post relatively positive, since it's a hobby that does, for the most part, bring me a lot of joy to partake in. I'll be honest, of course, but I try hard not to yuck other people's yums.

There are so many types of toy reviewers out there, and I feel like I've supported pretty much all of them at one point or another. Some people can come off as shills when they're really not- they're just excited, or a bit awkward behind the camera, or whatever.
Click to expand...
I think it's fair to critique anyone that puts themselves out in the world publicly. So I actually do think it's normal to critique a toy reviewer -- but more in the sense of 'how well are they accomplishing what they set out to accomplish?' For instance, toy reviewers where most of what you see is their hands, and they don't seem to know anything about how to move the toy around or use any of its accessories or whatever... that's a bad toy reviewer and they should work on that.

But ranking them by how big of a shill they are? That's super weird. Some toy reviewers are definitely worse for it. I get real annoyed watching a toy review and the guy is like "this Super7 figure is so solid and great quality, no loose joints at all!" and I'm literally watching him struggle to make the figure stand because the legs are flopping everywhere. I get it dude.. you got it for free and would like more things for free. But stop insulting my intelligence.

That being said, I can't imagine sitting down to RANK the people that do that. Just don't watch them and move on.
 
I like this Lizard reissue, but they could have also upgraded that awful tail. The new ‘90s head is fantastic tho. Worth the buy.
 
Damien said:
I think it's fair to critique anyone that puts themselves out in the world publicly.
Click to expand...
More people need to understand the truth of this. ESPECIALLY the folks putting themselves out publicly. You don’t get to play “LOOK AT ME!!” games and then get pissed when people look and comment on what they see.
 
I don't know how I feel about them reusing that ripped jeans She-Hulk body, but it's hard to pass on a She-Hulk. Still, I'd rather buy one like the ROML Red She-Hulk version in the purple and black suit on the newer body.

This one they're making would look cooler with shoes.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top