Forum Feedback

After some discussion, the moderation team has decided to disallow AI images, text, and speech. We understand that generative artificial intelligence has become commonplace, but this material comes at the cost of unpaid labor. Going forward, any posts containing AI material will be edited or removed.
 
After some discussion, the moderation team has decided to disallow AI images, text, and speech. We understand that generative artificial intelligence has become commonplace, but this material comes at the cost of unpaid labor. Going forward, any posts containing AI material will be edited or removed.
As someone who spent half my night yesterday filling out the paperwork as a victim of IP theft in the big Anthropic AI/copyright lawsuit because they fed ten years of my life's work into their algorithm without consent, I sincerely, and energetically, appreciate you all having a firm stance on this. (I'm supposed to give a talk in September on the risks to authors involving generative AI and I had the thought tonight I might just start with "I dunno, it gets worse every day for us, does anyone have any specific questions or shall we start drinking now?")
 
Thanks for doing so. I hate generative AI. I also hate how commonplace it's becoming and how it's likely to only get harder and harder to tell what is AI generated and what is not.
 
Wait, are people really AIing theor responses? That seems like it would take longer than posting.
In this case, we're MORE concerned about people using AI to generate images (memes, toy ideas, figure-art/action photos, etc). But while we're at it, it's worth just taking a stance on all of it and we're totally covered.
 
I am interested in the total coverage against AI package for sure.
I think what sells us entirely on it is the fact that so many Thots (is that what we're calling ourselves?) are literally professional creatives or near-professional creatives. Too many people we all are interacting with right here on this forum are actively having their work stolen to feed AI programs. It just seems right to say we don't want to see any of that here.
 
How mad would you guys be if I rearranged the subforum order again? I'd like them ordered by post count. Right now that'd be:
  1. Marvel (2)
  2. General (1)
  3. G.I. Joe (4)
  4. DC (3)
  5. MOTU (5)
  6. TMNT (7)
  7. Star Wars (6)
  8. Video Games (8)
  9. Transformers (9)
  10. Collections (10)
  11. Customs (11)
Current position in parentheses. While I prefer that order to the current setup, I don't like putting Marvel above General and I don't like separating Marvel and DC.

Thoughts?
 
The arrangement by popularity as determined by post counts makes sense, but like Chooch and Ru, I am down with either/any format.
 
I don't like putting Marvel above General and I don't like separating Marvel and DC.
Let's leave aside Collections and Customs for now, as I think those should be at the bottom regardless of everything else; I feel like a 'General Toys' thread needs to either be at the bottom of the list or the top. It doesn't make sense in my brain for it to be anywhere else. Either you have 'general' and then get more specific below it, or you have your specific stuff at the top and finish off with the 'and everything else goes here.'

I also agree that it feels weird to not have Marvel and DC next to each other.

I'll ALSO argue that there's no way the DC thread doesn't get a bump in popularity once we start seeing Mattel product images and pre-orders. So worrying about post count per sub-forum might cause you to be chasing your tail every month or two depending on what lines are putting out product and what people are currently talking about.
 
It appears the posts are all getting timestamped 34 or so minutes before they were actually done. The last post I made, just a moment after I did it, said "34 minutes ago", and I see it's happening to others. But that may be a 'me' issue for all I know and I'm simply seeing it that way.
 
Back
Top